Considering the alternative LSJL method relies on pushing two bones against one other at ligament and tendon attachment sites, understanding how mechanical loading affects tendons is important.
“Mechanical loading constantly acts on tendons. [We] investigate tendon mechanobiological responses through the use of mouse treadmill running as an in vivo model and mechanical stretching of tendon cells as an in vitro model. Mice underwent moderate treadmill running (MTR) and intensive treadmill running (ITR) regimens. Treadmill running elevated the expression of mechanical growth factors (MGF) and enhanced the proliferative potential of tendon stem cells (TSCs) in both patellar and Achilles tendons. In both tendons, MTR upregulated tenocyte-related genes: collagen type I (Coll. I ∼10 fold) and tenomodulin (∼3-4 fold), but did not affect non-tenocyte-related genes: LPL (adipocyte), Sox9 (chondrocyte){this is the gene were are looking for}, Runx2 and Osterix (both osteocyte). However, ITR upregulated both tenocyte (Coll. I ∼7-11 fold; tenomodulin ∼4-5 fold) and non-tenocyte-related genes (∼3-8 fold){so the load has to be sufficient to affect the target chondrogenic gene for our purposes. If the load is not intense enough it will not upregulate novel genes.}. In the in vitro study, TSCs and tenocytes were stretched to 4% and 8% using a custom made mechanical loading system. Low mechanical stretching (4%) of TSCs from both patellar and Achilles tendons increased the expression of only the tenocyte-related genes (Coll. I ∼5-6 fold; tenomodulin ∼6-13 fold), but high mechanical stretching (8%) increased the expression of both tenocyte (Coll. I ∼28-50 fold; tenomodulin ∼14-48 fold) and non-tenocyte-related genes (2-5-fold){Stretching has to be high to affect the target gene}. However, in tenocytes, non-tenocyte related gene expression was not altered by the application of either low or high mechanical stretching{So mechanical stretching likely cannot induce transdifferentiation or the microenvironment is partially responsible for the upregulation of non-tendon specific genes}. Excessive mechanical loading caused anabolic changes in tendons, it also induced differentiation of TSCs into non-tenocytes.”
So we induce the differentiation of TSCs and Ligament Stem Cells(which are likely similar to tenocyte stem cells) into chondrocytes at the entheses which can then form new growth plates.
“[IGF-1’s] Eb isoform, also known as mechano-growth factor (MGF), may be a key component of the mechanism that translates mechanical loads into cellular biological changes.”
“under mechanical loading conditions, TSC population in the tendon grows, providing progenitors”
““round tenocytes” were observed in the supraspinatus tendon after intensive treadmill running (16.7 m/min) for 12 weeks. Based on our findings in this study, we suspect that these “round tenocytes” could be chondrocytes differentiated from TSCs, because i) TSCs, not tenocytes, are able to undergo non-tenocyte differentiation under high mechanical loading conditions; ii) a round shape is a typical morphology of chondrocytes, and iii) these round cells produce abundant proteoglycans detected around the cells in the tendon”
This study provides evidence for the entheses method of LSJL loading(termed henceforth as entheses LSJL). Where the bone is clamped at the site where two bones are connected by a ligament. These ligaments contain entheses which attach to the bone and are similar in attachment to the Zone of Ranvier. That tendons contain stem cells which can differentiate into chondrocytes suggests that it’s probably highly similar that ligaments contain ligament stem cells which can differentiate into chondrocytes. The difference primarily being that tendons are constantly subjected to mechanical load by virtue of their attachment to muscle. The issue now is proving that there are stem cells within the entheses of a ligament.
This study though is for tendon enthesis and we are more interested in ligament enthesis’. But there should be a lot of similarities.
Optical anisotropy reveals molecular order in a mouse enthesis.
“Entheses are specialized biological structures that functionally anchor tendons {and ligaments} to bones. The molecular and supramolecular order of collagen and GAGs was determined for the collagen bundles of this enthesis. Based on a birefringence plot pattern as well as on metachromasy and linear dichroism after toluidine blue staining at pH 4.0, a similarity between the calcaneal tendon-bone enthesis and cartilage during ossification may be assumed. This similarity is assumed to favor the adequacy of this enthesis to support a compressive load. Considering that the collagen-proteoglycan complexes and the enthesis fibers themselves have a chiral nature, these structures could be acting via reciprocal signaling with the cellular environment of the enthesis.”
“Fibrous and fibrocartilaginous entheses are distinguished by the type of tissue at the attachment site”
“The attachment in an intact fibrocartilaginous ligament, which experiences compression, contains collagen types I, II and III, chondroitin 4-sulfate, chondroitin 6-sulfate, aggrecan and versican; however, the attachment in the disrupted ligament does not contain type II collagen and aggrecan”
“The collagen bundles in unstained, water-soaked sections from the calcaneal tendon exhibited intense birefringence{something to do with refraction}. The packing state of the collagen bundles increased, such that its maximum packing is attained around the calcaneal prominence. Fibrocartilage was detected in the proximity of the enthesis; collagen bundles gradually become less packed closer to the enthesis, where the bundles are separated by cartilage cells delimited by a birefringent extracellular, territorial matrix material”
“Chondrocytes were evident between the collagen bundles”
Knowledge about the attachment of ligaments and tendons to bone is important to the new method of LSJL loading. This method involves clamping regions where two bones are attached to each other via ligaments.
According to Physical Therapies in Sport and Exercise there is no communication between tendons and bone however. It describes the tendon enthesis as as an unmineralized bundle of rounded cell fibrocartilage wrapped in bundles of type II collagen. It states though that these cells do not have connective arms to other cells so tendons and bones would have no communication. We are interested in ligaments rather than tendons, as tendons would get a lot of load from muscular activity but is still relevant as both tendons and ligaments have entheses.
Enthesis fibrocartilage cells originate from a population of Hedgehog-responsive cells modulated by the loading environment.
“Tendon attaches to bone across a specialized tissue called the enthesis. This tissue modulates the transfer of muscle forces between two materials, i.e. tendon and bone, with vastly different mechanical properties. The enthesis for many tendons consists of a mineralized graded fibrocartilage that develops postnatally, concurrent with epiphyseal mineralization. By genetically demarcating cells expressing Gli1 in response to Hedgehog (Hh) signaling, we discovered a unique population of Hh-responsive cells in the developing murine enthesis that were distinct from tendon fibroblasts and epiphyseal chondrocytes. Lineage-tracing experiments revealed that the Gli1 lineage cells that originate in utero eventually populate the entire mature enthesis. Muscle paralysis increased the number of Hh-responsive cells in the enthesis, demonstrating that responsiveness to Hh is modulated in part by muscle loading{surprisingly lower muscle loading seems to increase responsiveness}. Ablation of the Hh-responsive cells during the first week of postnatal development resulted in a loss of mineralized fibrocartilage, with very little tissue remodeling 5 weeks after cell ablation. Conditional deletion of smoothened, a molecule necessary for responsiveness to Ihh, from the developing tendon and enthesis altered the differentiation of enthesis progenitor cells, resulting in significantly reduced fibrocartilage mineralization and decreased biomechanical function. Hh signaling within developing enthesis fibrocartilage cells is required for enthesis formation.”
“Fibrous entheses include a periosteal component and typically insert into the metaphyses or diaphyses of long bones. By contrast, fibrocartilagenous attachments typically insert into epiphyses or bone ridges. These attachments are characterized by a partially mineralized region of fibrocartilage at the tendon-bone interface, with a round cell morphology and increased proteoglycan content relative to tendon.Due to these characteristics, mature entheses have been likened to arrested growth plates“
Since tendons at first glance do not have much communication between themselves and bones how about ligaments?
Establishing a Coculture System for Ligament-Bone Interface Tissue Engineering
“Ligament-bone interface (enthesis) is a complex structure which comprises of ligament, fibrocartilage and bone. The fibrocartilage transformation adds significant insertional strength to the interface and makes it highly resistant to avulsion forces. Many ACL grafts cannot generate native interfacial region, leading to their failure. Co-culture has proved to be an effective way to generate new tissues in tissue engineering. Studies have found important signaling molecules in transduction pathway of chondrogenesis to be transmitted via gap junctions. Stem cells cocultured between ligament and bone cells would enable transmission of chondrogenic factors from bone/ligament cells to bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) via gap junctions, resulting in their differentiation into fibrocartilage. In this study, two set of co-culture (BMSCs and ligament cells; BMSCs and bone cells) were established. Confocal microscopy showed efficient dye transfer from bone/ligament cells into BMSCs. This was further confirmed and quantified by FACS, which showed a gradual temporal increase in the percentage of BMSCs acquiring Calcein.”
This study also states that there is ligament and bone communication:
In vitro study of stem cell communication via gap junctions for fibrocartilage regeneration at entheses.
“Entheses are fibrocartilaginous organs that bridge ligament with bone at their interface and add significant insertional strength. To replace a severely damaged ligament, a tissue-engineered graft preinstalled with interfacial fibrocartilage, which is being regenerated from stem cells, appears to be more promising than ligament-alone graft. Such a concept can be realized by a biomimetic approach of establishing a dynamic communication of stem cells with bone cells and/or ligament fibroblasts in vitro.
The current study has two objectives. The first objective is to demonstrate functional coculture of bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs) with mature bone cells/ligament fibroblasts as evidenced by gap-junctional communication in vitro. The second objective is to investigate the role of BMSCs in the regeneration of fibrocartilage within the coculture.
Rabbit bone/ligament fibroblasts were dual-stained with DiI-Red and calcein (gap-junction permeable dye), and cocultured with unlabeled BMSCs at fixed ratio (1:10). The functional gap junction was demonstrated by the transfer of calcein from donor to recipient cells that was confirmed and quantified by flow cytometry. Type 2 collagen (cartilage extracellular matrix-specific protein) expressed by the mixed cell lines in the cocultures were estimated and compared with that of the ligament-bone coculture (control).
Significant transfer of calcein into BMSCs was observed and flow cytometry analyses showed a gradual increase in the percentage of BMSCs acquiring calcein with time. Cocultures that included BMSCs expressed significantly more type 2 collagen compared with the control.
The current study reported the expression of gap-junctional communication of BMSCs with two adherent cell lines of musculoskeletal system in vitro and also confirmed that incorporation of stem cells augments fibrocartilage regeneration.”
“Inside the embryo, tendons and ligaments appear as fibrous cellular outgrowths from the perichondrium of cartilaginous precursor to later bone. In the neonates, as the cartilaginous anlage ossifies, fibrocartilaginous elements of the ligament are cemented into the initial calcified cartilage, which is later replaced by mature bone. Only a thin layer of proliferative epiphyseal cartilage remains at the interface{this is a very promising fact as proliferative epiphyseal cartilage is a solid start in term of neo growth plate formation}. The resulting mature tendon or ligament insertion comprises four zones: collagenous ligament or tendon, nonmineralized fibrocartilage, mineralized fibrocartilage and cancellous bone”
“Muscle forces are necessary for the development and maintenance of a mineralized skeleton. Removal of loads leads to malformed bones and impaired musculoskeletal function due to changes in bone (re)modeling. In the current study, the development of a mineralized junction at the interface between muscle and bone was examined under normal and impaired loading conditions. Unilateral mouse rotator cuff muscles were paralyzed using botulinum toxin A at birth. Control groups consisted of contralateral shoulders injected with saline and a separate group of normal mice. It was hypothesized that muscle unloading would suppress bone formation and enhance bone resorption at the enthesis, and that the unloading-induced bony defects could be rescued by suppressing osteoclast activity. In order to modulate osteoclast activity, mice were injected with the bisphosphonate alendronate. Bone formation was measured at the tendon enthesis using alizarin and calcein fluorescent labeling of bone surfaces followed by quantitative histomorphometry of histologic sections. Bone volume and architecture was measured using micro computed tomography. Osteoclast surface was determined via quantitative histomorphometry of tartrate resistant acid phosphatase stained histologic sections. Muscle unloading resulted in delayed initiation of endochondral ossification at the enthesis, but did not impair bone formation rate. Unloading led to severe defects in bone volume and trabecular bone architecture. These defects were partially rescued by suppression of osteoclast activity through alendronate treatment, and the effect of alendronate was dose dependent. Similarly, bone formation rate was increased with increasing alendronate dose across loading groups. The bony defects caused by unloading were therefore likely due to maintained high osteoclast activity, which normally decreases from neonatal through mature timepoints. These results have important implications for the treatment of muscle unloading conditions such as neonatal brachial plexus palsy, which results in shoulder paralysis at birth and subsequent defects in the rotator cuff enthesis and humeral head. “
This study only studied tendon and not ligament entheses though.
“The normal enthesis has a tendency to develop new bone formation with ageing. This manifests as incidental “bony spurs” that are visible on X-rays”
“Joint tissues under tension favours bone development and the outermost part of the enthesis is subject to predominant tension (pulling force).”
Here’s an entheses with neo-bone formation: Fc stands for fibrocartilage and the arrows are pointing at abnormal bone formation. Not how the fibrocartilage is shaped into the bone like a zone of ranvier.
“During the first year of life, the zone spreads over the adjacent metaphysis to form a fibrous circumferential ring bridging from the epiphysis to the diaphysis”
“This ring increases the mechanical strength of the physis and is responsible for appositional bone growths. Supplies chondrocytes to periphery“
The site also says that ligaments have rounder cell morphology than ligaments which is more consistent with a chondrocyte cell. Interestingly it says that ligaments also do not plastically deform which means that they can not permanently increase in length as a result of pulling force.
Strategies to engineer tendon/ligament-to-bone interface: Biomaterials, cells and growth factors.
“The complex and heterogeneous structure of the enthesis is essential to ensure smooth mechanical stress transfer between bone and soft tissues. Following injury, the interface is not regenerated, resulting in high rupture recurrence rates. “
“entheses exhibit gradients in tissue organization, composition and mechanical properties that serve to (1) effectively transfer stress between mechanically dissimilar materials and (2) sustain the heterotypic cellular communications required for interface function and homeostasis”
“the first part of the enthesis consists of fibrous connective tissue (tendon/ligament) characterized by the presence of parallel collagen fibers with interspaced elongated fibroblasts organized in arrays. The ECM primarily consists of collagen type I and small amounts of proteoglycans. The next zone is non-mineralized fibrocartilage, populated by round fibrochondrocytes arranged in rows. The ECM contains mostly collagen type II (typically characteristic of hyaline cartilage) as well as high levels of pericellular collagen type III, small amounts of collagen types I and X, and proteoglycans (mainly aggrecan) with associated chondroitin 4- and 6-sulfate glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). The third zone is mineralized fibrocartilage. This zone is populated by hypertrophic fibrochondrocytes, which are round and bigger than fibrochondrocytes. The ECM is composed mainly of collagen type II with significant amounts of collagen type X and aggrecan. Finally, the mineralized fibrocartilage merges into bone tissue containing osteoblasts, osteocytes and osteoclasts, together with collagen type I and high mineral content (69%) of which 99% is hydroxyapatite”<-Fibrocartilage may not be cartilage but it should should be capable of interestitial growth like growth plates.
“Enthesis fibrocartilage has been proposed to act as a barrier for cellular communication between tendon/ligament fibroblasts and osteocytes. This is due to the fact that fibrocartilage tissue is poorly vascularized and fibrochondrocytes do not express connexins and do not form gap junctions. Thus, intercellular communication needs to take place indirectly via cell–matrix interactions or soluble factors.”<-This will make getting stem cells from the enthesis into the bone slightly more challenging.
” the similarity in cellular and ECM composition between the fibrocartilage and the hyaline cartilage indicates an adaptation to compression. Consistently, mechanical loading plays an important role during enthesis maturation and contributes to the generation of a structural and cellular gradient at the insertion site. This gradation of structural composition turns into a gradation of mechanical properties that enables load transmission and reduces stress concentration”
Enthesis cells express both Scx+ and Sox9+ progenitor cells. We have to encourage the enthesis to express more Sox9.
“During murine development, a progenitor cell population expressing both scleraxis (Scx) and Sox9 differentiates into Sox9 + chondrocytes or Scx + tenocytes/ligamentocytes to form the tendon/ligament-to-cartilage junction. Tenocytes are derived from both Scx +/Sox9 − and Scx +/Sox9 + progenitors, while ligamentocytes are derived exclusively from Scx +/Sox9 + progenitors[So ligaments always have chondrocyte differentiation capacity]. The closer the tendon is to the cartilaginous primordium, the more tenocytes arise from Scx +/Sox9 + progenitors. Similarly, enthesal chondrocytes located near the tendon/ligament-to-cartilage junction arise from Scx +/Sox9 + progenitors, while growth plate chondrocytes are derived from Scx −/Sox9 + progenitors. As development proceeds, the Scx +/Sox9 + progenitor cells upregulate either Scx expression, leading to cells of the tendon/ligament lineage, or Sox9 expression, leading to cells of the chondrocyte lineage. It has been proposed that TGF-β is necessary for Scx +/Sox9 + progenitor cell lineage specification, while the BMP-4/Scx axis determines its differentiation.”
“Fibrochondrocyte cells are expected to show a higher expression of collagen type II and lower expression of collagen type I when compared to fibroblasts.
Hypertrophic fibrochondrocytes synthetize higher levels of collagen type X.
Chondrocytes produce more collagen type II and less collagen type I than fibrochondrocytes.”
According to this paper, a crocodile may have a fibrocartilagenous growth plate which means that creating such a growth plate for humans is possible:
Crocodilian bone-tendon and bone-ligament interfaces
“We investigated bone-tendon (27 sites) and bone-ligament (12 sites) interfaces in six pairs of crocodile limbs and girdles under light microscopy. These crocodilian interfaces often included a direct, unmediated insertion in which the tendon or ligament fibers inserted directly into the bone itself without fibrocartilaginous mediation. This was quite different from the usual direct insertion known in mammals and lizards. Fibrocartilaginous tissue at the bone-tendon interface is generally believed to protect tendon fibers against shear stress. Other types of insertions were found in the crocodilian epiphyses, namely, hyaline cartilage and pseudofibrocartilaginous insertions. Notably, a thick periosteum/perichondrium and subchondral layer was involved at both interfaces. The thick periosteum/perichondrium seemed to form along the epiphyseal hyaline cartilage and might function in replacement of fibrocartilaginous tissues. Crocodilian thick periosterum/perichondrium would be expected to reinforce the limb and girdle bones — especially their epiphyses, in which secondary centers of ossification are absent. The subchondral layer — a kind of fibrocartila-ginous tissue — seemed to play the role of the growth plate in compensating for the absence of secondary centers of ossification. Therefore, we hypothesized that the crocodile-specific bone-tendon interfaces were the result of these specializations of bone development and growth. In crocodiles, the disadvantages of the single ossification center are effectively compensated for by specialized morphologies, including these interfaces. Specialized bone growth provides the crocodile with the largest body size of the recent reptiles and an extremely fast method of locomotion.”
Although according to the book Fins into Limbs: Evolution, Development, and Transformation avian growth plates become fibrocartilagenous when they are done growing.
The human tibial tubercle is formed by fibrous growth plates.
“The development of a functional attachment between tendon and bone (the “enthesis”) is critical for transmitting muscle forces to bone for joint motion. The formation of this attachment is driven by mechanical and biologic factors. Murine models of have demonstrated that removal of muscle load dramatically impairs the development of the enthesis. Furthermore, deletion of scleraxis (Scx), a transcription factor necessary for the development of force-transmitting tendons, leads to defects in enthesis formation. However, the mechanisms driving the mechanosensitivity of enthesis development are not known. Our global hypothesis is that Scx necessary for enthesis development and is driven by mechanical cues during{Maybe we can alter mechanical cues to alter enthesis development}. The first aim of this study is to determine the temporal influence of Scx on neonatal enthesis maturation using an inducible knockout murine model. Expression of Scx will be limited to development up to embryonic day 15.5, post-natal day 1, or post-natal day 7 and developmental adaptations and maturation of the enthesis will be assessed throughout juvenile development. It is expected that deletion of Scx during embryonic development will have a greater effect on enthesis maturation compared to post-natal deletion, and molecular and functional outcomes will be correlated with duration of Scx expression during maturation. These findings will establish the importance of Scx in enthesis development as well as determine its temporal role in post- natal musculoskeletal development. The second aim of this study is to determine the necessity of mechanical loading on Scx expression during development. Using in vivo and in vitro methods, we plan to mimic unloading and overloading, respectively, as well as assess the mechanosensitivity of Scx and its role in maturation and function of the enthesis. Using previously validated models of in vivo unloading and tissue-engineered methods for in vitro dynamic loading, we will track Scx-expressing cells as well as potential differentiation of ASCs into tenocytes. The effect of perturbed loading on the molecular and morphological response of Scx-expressing cells will be correlated with adaptations in structure and function using mechanical tests. These findings will determine the role of mechanical loading in Scx expression as well as the necessity of Scx in mechanically- induced tenogenesis. Lastly, the potency of Scx in load-induced tenogenesis following modulation with growth factors such as BMP-12 will be confirmed using BMP-12 siRNA. Findings from these studies will establish the importance of Scx on post-natal enthesis development, the mechanoresponsiveness of Scx in multi-tiered experimental models, and ultimately lead to new approaches for investigating musculoskeletal development and tissue engineered strategies for mechanosensitive orthopaedic tissues.”
Functional Attachment of Soft Tissues to Bone: Development, Healing, and Tissue Engineering
“Connective tissues such as tendons or ligaments attach to bone across a multitissue interface with spatial gradients in composition, structure, and mechanical properties. These gradients minimize stress concentrations and mediate load transfer between the soft and hard tissues.”
“A specialized interface, called an insertion site or enthesis, integrates tendon or ligament to bone and serves to facilitate joint motion”
Note how the tendon looks like it’s integrated into the bone.
“Fibrous insertions typically occur over large areas, presumably to distribute forces and reduce stresses, and are characterized by perforating mineralized collagen fibers”
“The first zone consists of tendon/ligament, is populated by fibroblasts, and has mechanical properties similar to those of the tendon/ligament mid-substance. It is composed of linearly arrayed type I collagen fibers. The second zone consists of fibrocartilage, is populated by fibrochondrocytes, and is composed of types I, II, and III collagen and the proteoglycan aggrecan. The third zone is also populated by fibro-chondrocytes and is composed of mineralized fibrocartilage. Here, type II collagen predominates, and there are significant amounts of type X collagen as well as aggrecan. The fourth zone consists of bone proper, within which osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts reside in a matrix of mineralized type I collagen.”
“the stratified tissue regions are compositionally distinct but structurally continuous.”<-thus anything that pulls on the tendon/ligament pulls on the bone.
“Enthesis development is initially driven by endochondral ossification: Cartilage mineralizes to form bone, and a fibrocartilaginous transition then develops at the interfaces between the bone and connective tissues.”
“All of the cell types found along the enthesis are mechanoresponsive; therefore, a role for mechanobiology during the development of this tissue is expected. Studies using genetically modified mice with muscular defects demonstrated that, although muscle loading was not required for initiation of enthesis formation, it was necessary for the subsequent growth and maturation of the enthesis”
“The reduction in muscle loading impaired mineral deposition and fibrocartilage formation and led to disorganized fiber distribution and inferior mechanical properties at the developing tendon enthesis.”
“mineralization at the developing enthesis is sensitive to mechanical loading.”
“when calcium phosphate cement was used to fill the tendon-to-bone junction in a rabbit ACL reconstruction model, the ceramic augmented bone tissue growth and organization”
“After the periosteal flap was sutured to the end of a torn rabbit infraspinatus tendon and then attached to bone, a fibrocartilage-like matrix developed after 12 weeks”
“Chondrocytes reorganize the extracellular matrix of articular cartilage in response to externally applied loads. Thereby, different loading characteristics lead to different biological responses. Despite of active research in this area, it is still unclear which parts of the extracellular matrix adapt in what ways, and how specific loading characteristics affect matrix changes. This review focuses on the influence of cyclic tensilestrain on chondrocyte metabolism in vitro. It also aimed to identify anabolic or catabolic chondrocyte responses to different loading protocols. The key findings show that loading cells up to 3% strain, 0.17 Hz, and 2 h, resulted in weak or no biological responses. Loading between 3-10% strain, 0.17-0.5 Hz, and 2-12 h led to anabolic responses; and above 10% strain, 0.5 Hz, and 12 h catabolic events predominated{catabolic responses doesn’t necessarily mean bad for height growth}. However, this review also discusses that various other factors are involved in the remodeling of the extracellular matrix in response to loading, and that parameters like an inflammatory environment might influence the biological response.”<-3% strain is quite high but that’s for bone for cartilage it may be different.
“cartilage compression exposes the chondrocyte to compressive forces, to osmotic pressure, to fluid flows and also to tensile forces”<-lateral compression such as via lateral loading of the articular cartilage has potential to induce tensile forces.
“after loading with CTS, cells exhibited a more elongated cell shape and aligned perpendicular to the loading direction”
Collagen Type I was upregulated by CTS which could indicated endochondral ossification.
“Fibronectin connects collagen fibers and other ECM proteins. It is linked to the cell membrane through integrins and might transmit forces from the ECM to the chondrocyte. CTS at 7%, 0.33 Hz and 0.5 Hz, for 4, 12 and 24 h increased the fibronectin mRNA levels in comparison to non-loaded chondrocytes”
“7% CTS for 4 h at 0.33 Hz elevated the expression of IGF-1 and IGF-2. The mRNA expression of TGF-β1 was increased by several loading protocols ranging from strains of 5–12%, from 12–48 h and at frequencies of 0.05 and 0.5 Hz”
This study would only be relevant to people with existing growth plates as it only studies load effects on chondrocytes. But, regardless, since we are studying mechanical loading methods to study height growth any mechanical loading study may be relevant.
“The physis, or growth plate, is a complex disc-shaped cartilage structure that is responsible for longitudinal bone growth. In this study, a multi-scale computational approach was undertaken to better understand how physiological loads are experienced by chondrocytes embedded inside chondrons when subjected to moderate strain under instantaneous compressive loading of the growth plate. Models of representative samples of compressed bone/growth-plate/bone from a 0.67 mm thick 4-month old bovine proximal tibial physis were subjected to a prescribed displacement equal to 20% of the growth plate thickness. At the macroscale level, the applied compressive deformation resulted in an overall compressive strain across the proliferative-hypertrophic zone of 17%. The microscale model predicted that chondrocytes sustained compressive height strains of 12% and 6% in the proliferative and hypertrophic zones, respectively, in the interior regions of the plate. This pattern was reversed within the outer 300 μm region at the free surface where cells were compressed by 10% in the proliferative and 26% in the hypertrophic zones, in agreement with experimental observations. While the current model is relevant to fast dynamic events, such as heel strike in walking, we believe this approach provides new insight into the mechanical factors that regulate bone growth at the cell level and provides a basis for developing models to help interpret experimental results at varying time scales. ”
“The physis, or growth plate, is a complex disc-shaped cartilage structure that is responsible for longitudinal bone growth. This growth is modulated by many systemic and local factors including those arising from mechanical loading”
“Potential tissue level signals for modulating endochondral bone formation [include] hydrostatic and octahedral shear stresses and principal stresses”
“chondrocytes, are the active agents of growth and contribute to bone growth through cell proliferation, hypertrophy and extracellular matrix secretion in highly specialized, highly cellular and organized anatomic structures known as chondrons. It is likely that tissue level strains and stresses are experienced differently by chondrocytes embedded within such structures, possibly providing signals of varying intensity and type depending on location.”
“Mechanotransduction is more readily related to cell deformation than to tissue level stresses. In the context of bone growth, there is evidence that cell proliferation and differentiation can be regulated through activation of stretch-activated ion channels in the cell membrane following changes in cellular shape and size”
“Recent observational studies of physeal samples under compression have revealed regional variations in cellular strains and suggest that global physeal strains may be amplified at the cellular level”<-This statement may be applicable to other cells like the enthesis of ligament attachments or mesenchymal stem cells.
“The prescribed compressive displacement which was equivalent to 20% of the initial uncompressed combined initial thicknesses (0.67 mm) of RZ and P/H zones resulted in a -14.8% growth plate engineering strain across the combined layers of the reserve, proliferative and hypertrophic zones, while the combined proliferative and hypertrophic zone received -17.2% strain. The reserve zone experienced -9.5% and the calcified cartilage zone -3.3% compressive strain.”<-Effects on the reserve zone are interesting to us because those contain stem cells so would show any interesting effects on non-growth plate cells.
“Chondrons, the primary functional and structural units of the growth plate, deformed by buckling near the free surfaces where the cartilage bulged outward while remaining straight in the interior regions”
“chondrocytes in the interior of the growth plate undergo about 50% less strain than the prescribed overall growth plate strain.”
“Younger growth plates that are thicker (3 mm) also had thicker reserve zones, which may affect the transverse outward bulging at the free surface differently.”
“During compression of cells at short times scales (~0.5 s) intracellular water is redistributed within the cell[but not necessarily more compression]”
” At long time scales constant external pressure induces cell shrinkage, but cell shrinkage takes an order of magnitude (~10 s,) longer than the transient impact of heel strike or even the 0.2 s duration of the stance phase of a gait cycle and as long as an hour to reach equilibrium”
“growth plate stresses reached values of 0.1 to 0.6 MPa in compression during activities such as sitting. From the stress relaxation experiments on explants it may be estimated that 0.2 MPa corresponds to the stress levels attained after stress relaxation for displacements of the epiphysis equal to 20% of the initial growth plate thickness (defined as the combined thicknesses of the reserve, proliferative and hypertrophic zones).”
“Chondrons appear to be oriented along the minimum principal strain directions, becoming roughly perpendicular to the epiphyseal bone plate, whereas the hypertrophic portion along with the calcified cartilage bars and primary spongiosa align more with the primary compressive load direction along the tibial long axis”
Some interesting info but the significance is unclear yet.
To focus on the disadvantages of height is an unhealthy psychological pursuit. To focus on striving to grow taller is a healthy psychological pursuit.
Here’s a typical conversation to someone about height:
A: Don’t worry about height. It’s what’s on the inside that counts.
B: Why is it acceptable for height to be descriminated against? Why is male height so associated with a male’s value? Why is it acceptable to laugh at people because of their height?
A: You should accept who you are. Play with the cards your dealt.
B: If you have a losing hand, do you accept that or do you throw the cards off the table and start a fist fight? If you can’t beat the game change the rules.
A: Life isn’t fair. Sucks for you.
If you try to get into an argument with someone about height it usually begins with a lot of platitudes which are refuted until their opposing argument devolves into “too bad”.
The argument with the best reasoning often isn’t the argument that wins. Short support sites shouldn’t exist. Realistically, very little improvements can be made for the average or below against the tall. And ultimately such sites serve as a means of perseverating on height.
You can try to forget your height. You can play video games. You can engage in an activity where height is of less importance such as a musical instrument. Although even in those activities such as piano or guitar, finger length has an effect on playing. You can get around it with techniques but it’s still a reminder that you’re just not as good. Even playing pool, height can be an advantage in performing certain shots.
There’s acceptance but will you ever accept? Ryan Seacrest complains about his height all the time. There’s escapism but will you be satisfied with just escape? Most forms of escapism lack the depth and complexity of real life.
The healthiest way to focus on height is to strive to find a way to grow taller. Instead of dwelling on it. Instead of comparing height with your friends. Instead of realizing that you’re shorter than that other guy that you thought was really short.
The research I’ve done on entheses is intriguing and I’m trying to develop a new routine to explore it. What’s most intriguing about Entheses is that it resembles the Zone of Ranvier which contains the stem cells to contribute to the growth plate. What if by pushing two bones together such as the fibula and the tibia on the epiphyseal region we can stimulate the entheses to form neo growth plates?
Don’t accept that there’s no way to grow taller.
Your height is mostly based on the length of your bones{The other determinants of height are opportunities to find new ways to grow taller}. The length of the bones is determined mostly by your growth plate{The rest of the length is determined by other means but are difficult to get to contribute in significant ways but again is another way to pursue the quest for height}. The growth plate goes away after puberty after the exhaustion of the stem cells that contribute to the growth plate.
To grow taller you could find:
1) Increase other minor determinants of height not involving growth plate growth
2) Induce the formation of neo growth plates
3) Induce plastic(permanent) deformation of the long bones. Stretch the bones in such a way that they increase in length in a way that is instant and permanent(although this has never bone in done and the mechanisms of measurement are not accurate enough to best gauge the elastic and plastic range of a bone).
4) Other? For you to determine.
Escapism and acceptance aren’t the only options for dealing with your height. Don’t let people tell you that you should just accept your height. Every time you think about dwelling on the negative effects of not being tall, focus instead on finding ways to grow taller.
You can get distraction osteogenesis surgery but it costs a lot of money and ideally you’d have multiple surgeries.
This field of science is entirely under researched(but most areas are due to how slowly science progresses). And due to the complexity it is difficult for it to be Lorenzo’s Oiled(Homemade scientific discovery). It’ll be hard to find a more efficient way of performing distraction osteogenesis but you could find a home made way of inducing new growth plate formation. Cells do respond to mechanical and chemical stimulation after all. And has every manner of mechanical stimulation already been performed? No. Especially methods that would appear counterintuitive like lateral joint loading(now adjusted to focus more on pushing two bones together near the entheses rather than clamping the synovial joint region). And there are novel apparatus to create to generate forces that we couldn’t using our own muscular force.
Don’t dwell on how Dave France doesn’t get as good a roles as James Franco because he’s shorter. Don’t dwell on how the third Hemsworth brother doesn’t get as many roles because he’s shorter.
Focus on researching methods to grow taller! Even when I find a way to grow taller, it’s not going to be perfect right away. I’m going to need your help. You’re going to need my help. The faster people stop dwelling on height and start growing taller the faster we can start getting taller.
