How Platelet Derived Growth Factor PDGF Effects Growth And Height

Another type of growth factor which I have been noticing being mentioned a lot when looking at the regulation of the growth plate have been a group of growth factors known as Platelet Derived Growth Factor, PDGF. This post will be my attempt in doing at least some basic research on this group of growth regulation proteins. I hope that I will be able to find at least a few from the overall group that do have a critical role in growth plate regulation and chondrocyte proliferation.

First, let’s start with Wikipedia and see what it has to say about Platelet Derived Growth Factors, PDGFs….


In molecular biology, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) is one of the numerous growth factors, or proteins that regulate cell growth and division. In particular, it plays a significant role in blood vessel formation (angiogenesis), the growth of blood vessels from already-existing blood vessel tissue. Uncontrolled angiogenesis is a characteristic of cancer.

PDGF is a potent mitogen for cells of mesenchymal origin, including smooth muscle cells and glial cells.

Though it is synthesized stored and released by platelets upon activation, it is produced by a plethora of cells including smooth muscle cells, activated macrophages, and endothelial cells

Function

PDGFs are mitogenic during early developmental stages, driving the proliferation of undifferentiated mesenchyme and some progenitor populations. During later maturation stages, PDGF signalling has been implicated in tissue remodelling and cellular differentiation, and in inductive events involved in patterning and morphogenesis. In addition to driving mesenchymal proliferation, PDGFs have been shown to direct the migration, differentiation and function of a variety of specialised mesenchymal and migratory cell types, both during development and in the adult animal.

PDGF plays a role in embryonic development, cell proliferation, cell migration, and angiogenesis. PDGF has also been linked to several diseases such as atherosclerosis, fibrosis and malignant diseases.

PDGF is also known to maintain proliferation of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells.


Analysis & Interpretation:

From this quick definition found from Wikipedia, I would guess that the PDGFs are a group of proteins that regulate the rate at which many progenitor cells divide. The PDGF is known as a mitogen. From Wikipedia, the term mitogen refers to some external factor or compound that causes a cell to start dividing aka proliferating. If this function was applied to the focus of our research, height increase, we could say that there should be some type of mitogen, probably a PDGF that is also involved in controlling the rate at which the chondrocytes in the growth plate will divide and grow in number. The undifferentiated mesenchyme the definition is talking about can refer to the MSCs we find in the bone marrow of the intermedullary cavity of long bones.

However it seems that the PDGFs seem to work mainly on smooth muscle cells, glial cells, and oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (or a type of brain cell). What may be the most important thing to take out of this article is that the PDGFs are involved in the formation of blood vessels aka angiogenesis.

For the purposes of our desire to increase height, previous research has shown that having blood vessel disruption in the metaphyseal area of long bones may actually increase longtitudinal growth. It is important to realize that a long bone in a human body has blood vessels going in various parts of the long bone, to the ends of the bone, the epiphysis, to the middle, and to the growth plates as well.

Let’s not forget that the growth plates are cartilage, and cartilage intrinsically does not have any blood vessels going through the extracellular matric of the cartilage. The cartilage is both protected from angiogenesis and vascularization by the perichondrium (in the articular and epiphyseal cartilage) as well as angiogenesis inhibitor factors like Chondromodulin. Any “food” that the chondrocytes in the epiphyseal cartilage does get must be diffused through the matrix to it. As it should happen, when the growth plates starts getting punctured in the walls by the blood vessels, that is when the rate at which ossification and calcification of the cartilage become increased beyond the limit at which the cartilage can possibly regenerate more chondrocytes which form cartilage from the resting zone.


If we now look at the Wikipedia article on Platelet Derived Growth Factor Receptor

Platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGF-R) are cell surface tyrosine kinase receptors for members of the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) family. PDGF subunits -A and -B are important factors regulating cell proliferation, cellular differentiation, cell growth, development and many diseases including cancer. There are two forms of the PDGF-R, alpha and beta each encoded by a different gene. Depending on which growth factor is bound, PDGF-R homo- or heterodimerizes.

Interaction with signal transduction molecules

Tyrosine phosphorylation sites in growth factor receptors serve two major purposes: to control the state of activity of the kinase and to create binding sites for downstream signal transduction molecules, which in many cases also are substrates for the kinase.

Analysis & Interpretation:

We are seeing that the PDGF receptors are just like so many other receptors we have been studying and research before. They are also tyrosine kinase, which we had studied when we looked at the Wnt/Beta-Catenin Signaling pathway and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. The PDGFs are just another type of growth factor then that “moves” in the extracellular fluid to eventually bind with the receptors it has on the outer cellular membrane which it would cause a cascading signal pathway. However, this type of knowledge does not tell us how exactly do this type of growth factor affect and relate to growth and overal human height.

Thus, we need to turn to studies which we might be able to find from PubMed. The first study I will turn to is “Platelet derived growth factor stimulates chondrocyte proliferation but prevents endochondral maturation.”

Endocrine. 1997 Jun;6(3):257-64.

Platelet derived growth factor stimulates chondrocyte proliferation but prevents endochondral maturation.

Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Alderete M, Dean DD, Boyan BD.
Source
OsteoBiologics, Inc., San Antonio, TX, USA.

Abstract

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) is a cytokine released by platelets at sites of injury to promote mesenchymal cell proliferation. Since many bone wounds heal by endochondral bone formation, we examined the response of chondrocytes in the endochondral lineage to PDGF. Confluent cultures of rat costochondral resting zone cartilage cells were incubated with 0-300 ng/mL PDGF-BB for 24 h to determine whether dose-dependent changes in cell proliferation (cell number and [3H]-thymidine incorporation), alkaline phosphatase specific activity, [35S]-sulfate incorporation, or [3H]-proline incorporation into collagenase-digestible protein (CDP) or noncollagenase-digestible protein (NCP), could be observed. Long-term effects of PDGF were assessed in confluent cultures treated for 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10 d with 37.5 or 150 ng/mL PDGF-BB. To determine whether PDGF-BB could induce resting zone chondrocytes to change maturation state to a growth zone chondrocyte phenotype, confluent resting zone cell cultures were treated for 1, 2, 3, or 5 d with 37.5 or 150 ng/ml PDGF-BB and then challenged for an additional 24 h with 1,25-(OH)2D3. PDGF-BB caused a dose-dependent increase in cell number and [3H]-thymidine incorporation at 24 h. The proliferative effect of the cytokine decreased with time. PDGF-BB had no effect on alkaline phosphatase at 24 h, but at later times, the cytokine prevented the normal increase in enzyme activity seen in post-confluent cultures. This effect was primarily on the cells and not on the matrix. PDGF-BB stimulated [35S]-sulfate incorporation at all times examined, but had no effect on [3H]-proline incorporation into either the CDP or NCP pools. Thus, percent collagen production was not changed. Treatment of the cells for up to 5 d with PDGF-BB failed to elicit a 1,25-(OH)2D3 responsive phenotype typical of rat costochondral growth zone cartilage cells. These results show that committed chondrocytes can respond to PDGF-BB with increased proliferation. The effect of the cytokine is to enhance cartilage matrix production, but at the same time to prevent progression of the cells along the endochondral maturation pathway.

PMID: 936868[PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]


Analysis & Interpretation:

From Wikipedia…

Cytokines are small cell-signaling protein molecules that are secreted by numerous cells and are a category of signaling molecules used extensively in intercellular communication. Cytokines can be classified as proteins, peptides, or glycoproteins; the term “cytokine” encompasses a large and diverse family of regulators produced throughout the body by cells of diverse embryological origin. The term “cytokine” has been used to refer to the immuno modulating agents, such as interleukins and interferons. Biochemists disagree as to which molecules should be termed cytokines and which hormones.

Platelets, or thrombocytes are small, irregularly shaped clear cell fragments (i.e. cells that do not have a nucleus) which are derived from fragmentation of precursor megakaryocytes.  The average lifespan of a platelet is normally just 5 to 9 days. Platelets are a natural source of growth factors.

We learn that many wounds, which I would guess represent both skin lacerations and bone fractures, when going through the process of healing have these platelets which release the PDGF, also known as a cytokine. The researchers would take resting zone chondrocytes from the costochondral region and have them cultured and have a specific type of PDGF called PDGF-BB added to see whether the cultures will show proliferation, increased collagen production, alkaline phosphatase activity, thymidine incorporation, or  sulfate or proline incorporation. The results showed that with the PDGF-BB it seems that the initial injections did show the resting zone chondrocytes proliferate (ie. grow in number and show thymidine incorporation) but the effects over time of the PDGF decreased in effectiveness.


From 2nd PubMed study…

[Degree of differentiation of chondrocytes and their pretreatment with platelet-derived-growth factor. Regulating induction of cartilage formation in resorbable tissue carriers in vivo].

Orthopade. 2000 Feb;29(2):120-8.

[Article in German]

Lohmann CH, Schwartz Z, Niederauer GG, Boyan BD.

Source

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, USA. LohmannCH@t-online.de

Abstract

Current methods for articular cartilage repair are unpredictable with respect to clinical success. In the present study, we investigated the ability of cells from articular cartilage, perichondrium, and costochondral resting zone to form new cartilage when loaded onto biodegradable scaffolds and implanted into calf muscle pouches of nu/nu mice. Prior in vitro studies showed that platelet derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB), but not transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-beta 1), basic fibroblast growth factor, or bone morphogenetic protein-2 promoted proliferation and extracellular matrix sulfation of resting zone chondrocytes without causing the cells to exhibit a hypertrophic chondrocyte phenotype. TGF-beta 1 has also been shown to stimulate chondrogenesis by multipotent chondroprogenitor cells like those in the perichondrium. In addition, PDGF-BB has been shown to modulate chondrogensis by resting zone cells implanted in poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG) scaffolds. In the present study we examined whether the cartilage formation is dependent on state of chondrocyte maturation and whether the pretreatment of chondrocytes with growth factors has an influence on the cartilage formation. Scaffolds were manufactured from 80% PLG with a 75:25 lactide:glycolide ratio and 20% modified PLG with a 50:50 lactide:glycolide ratio (PLG-H scaffolds). For each experimental group, four nude mice received two identical implants, one in each calf muscle resulting in an N = 8 implants: PLG-H scaffolds alone; PLG-H scaffolds with cells derived from either the femoral articular cartilage, costochondral periochondrium, or costochondral resting zone cartilage of 125 g male Sprague-Dawley rats; PLG-H scaffolds with either articular chondrocytes or resting zone chondrocytes that were pretreated with 37.5 ng/ml rhPDGF-BB for 4 h or 24 h before implantation, or with perichondrial cells treated with PDGF-BB plus 0.22 ng/ml rhTGF beta-1 for 4 h and 24 h. At 4 or 8 weeks after implantation, samples were harvested and analyzed histomorphometrically for new cartilage formed, area of residual implant and area of fibrous connective tissue. Only resting zone cells showed the ability to form new cartilage at a heterotopic site in this study. There was no neocartilage found in nude mice with implants loaded with either articular chondrocytes or perichondrial cells. Pretreatment of resting zone chondrocytes for 4 h prior to implantation significantly increased the amount of newly formed cartilage after 8 weeks and suppressed chondrocyte hypertrophy. The amount of fibrous connective tissue around implants containing either articular chondrocytes or perichondrial cells decreased with time, whereas the amount of fibrous connective tissue around implants containing resting zone chondrocytes pretreated with PDGF-BB was increased. The results showed that resting zone cells can be successfully incorporated into biodegradable porous PLG scaffolds and can induce new cartilage formation in a nonweight-bearing site. Articular chondrocytes as well as perichondrial cells did not have the capacity for neochondrogenesis when implanted heterotopically in this model.

PMID: 10743633 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

Analysis & Interpretation:

The researchers wanted to see whether adding a certain type of growth factor into the chondrocytes which was extracted from perichondrium, resting zones, and articular cartilage and then imbedded into scafolds would result in better/ greater cartilage formation. From old results seen from other experiments on the effects of all the most well known growth factors, the TGF-Betas, the BMP-2, the bFGFs, and the PDGFs, the PDGFs seemed to be the group which could get the chondrocytes to proliferate and increase extracellular matrix sulfation without getting the chondrocytes to take the direction of mutaration into hypertrophy. The study was also going to see whether the state of the maturation of the cartilage in the scaffold would also be modulating the cartilage formation rate.

The idea was to take the PGL derived scaffold with chondrocytes embedded into them and implant the scaffold into the limbs of test animals with a growth factor treatment to see whether the growth factor which the scaffold was pretreated with will help in making new cartilage formationBesides using the PDGF-BB as the growth factor, TGF-Beta was also using as a comparison growth factor, as well as combining the two growth factors together. The results reveal that the only type of chondrocytes which showed cartilage formation were from the resting zone. The implants into the mice which were from the articular cartilage or the perichondrium showed no cartilage formation after the implantation of the scaffold/chondrocyte mix. .


Study #3: Formation of repaired hyaline cartilage using PDGF-treated chondrocyte/PCL construct in rabbit knee articular cartilage defect

From the Abstract…

Platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) has a positive mitogenic and chemotactic effect on mesenchyme derived cells, and its receptor has been identified also on chondrocytes [16]. The main reason for the usage of PDGF as a promoting factor for cartilage repair comes from the healing response in cartilage defects treated with microfracture. In this method, the formed clot in the defect site can provide an environment enriched with growth factors such as PDGF, exerting chemotactic and mitogenic effects [17]. PDGF has a direct effect on chondrocytes proliferation, differentiation and cartilage proteoglycan production and is thus believed to be able of enhancing tissue regeneration and repair [15, 16].

Although there are differences between human and animal tissues, for examining a novel treatment, a suitable animal model can be used as an important tool in enhancement of regenerative medicine. Furthermore, histological assessment of human articular cartilage after ACT is limited because biopsy for obtaining specimen may result in joint injury. In this study, we used rabbit which is a widely used animal model in study of tissue regeneration. Regarding the importance of PDGF as promoting factor for cartilage healing, we designed this study to evaluate whether PDGF is able to stimulate transplanted constructs for producing a hyaline-like repaired tissue instead of fibrocartilage one and enhance the integration of chondrocyte/PCL complex implanted in the damaged knee articular cartilage in rabbits.

Analysis & Interpretation:

It would seem that besides the many receptors found on the surface of chondrocytes, the receptor for the Platelet derived growth factor is also on it. It seems that cartilage defects from microfractures show really good results when treated with the PDGF. The interesting thing is that the abstract states explictly that the PDGF has a direct effect on chondrocyte proliferation, differentiation, and proteoglycan production. The most interesting thing that the PDGF has an effect on is that if one uses this type of growth factor on cartilage defects, the cartilage that it can produce is of the hyaline cartilage variety, not he fibrocartilage one would find. As always, the chondrocyte with the PCL scaffold matrix is used for embedding into the damaged region of cartilage in test animals/rabbits.

Short Male Babies And Adult Have Increase Risk Of Violent Suicide Attempts

Me: I found this study which linked to small babies to adult suicide rates to be very interesting. The biological answer that is stated is over the fact that smaller babies haveve less serotonin, which contributes to impulsivity, agression, and suicidal behavior. It seems babies which are born either shorter or lighter than their counter parts are both at risk to suicide. However, that is not all. Short stature in adulthood also increased the suicide tendency, which makes perfect sense, where they were smaller as a baby or average as a baby. It seems no matter how we view it, smaller people just have higher rates of suicide attempts. Obviously there is a social and emotional challenge associated with small stature and I believe completely that anyone who has insecurities with their small stature should seek comfort and help from someone to reduce the risks of suicidal behavior.

From Science Daily

Short Male Babies Have More Than Double The Risk Of Violent Suicide Attempts, Study Suggests

ScienceDaily (Jan. 18, 2008) — Short male babies run more than double the risk of a violent suicide attempt as an adult, suggests a new study. Catch up growth during childhood does not lessen the impact of short stature at birth, the research shows.

(Me: That is very interesting that catch-up growth seems to have no effect so it is more than just social or emotional but biological in nature)

The findings are based on almost 320,000 Swedish men out of a total of more than 713,000 people all born between 1973 and 1980. Using national registers, they were tracked from birth to the date of attempted suicide, death, emigration, or the end of 1999, whichever came first.

Short babies of less than 47 cm in length, were more likely to attempt suicide as adults, no matter what height they reached in adulthood, compared with normal length babies. Short birth length also more than doubled the risk of a violent suicide attempt as opposed to a non-violent one.

A violent suicide attempt was defined as hanging, the use of a firearm or knives, jumping from a height or in front of vehicles, and drowning.

Short stature in adulthood also boosted the risk.

Men who were normal length babies, but who were short in adult life were 56% more likely than tall men to attempt to take their own lives. The taller a man was, the less likely he was to attempt suicide, the findings showed.

Men who were born underweight (under 2500 g), but who reached normal height were more than 2.5 times as likely to make a violent suicide attempt.

And those who were born prematurely, and therefore short and underweight, were more than four times as likely to attempt violent suicide as those born after 38 to 40 weeks of pregnancy.

The authors suggest that the brain chemical serotonin may be key. It is crucial to brain development and low levels are important in impulsivity, aggression, and suicidal behaviour. Serotonin levels may be affected by premature birth and other factors restricting growth in the womb, they add.

This study, Fetal and childhood growth and the risk of violent and non-violent suicide attempts: A cohort study of 318,953 men, is published in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

The LIN28B Gene’s Influence On Height

Me: This is news to me since I haven’t read up on the entire list of 180 genes that affect height in the gene database section. I know that Tyler has talked about LIN28B along with HMGA2. It turns out that the LIB28B gene is actually really influential. It mediates the progenitor cells from bone marrow. Note that the article says that LIN28B is associated with timing of menarche (menarche is the time when a female experiences her first period) so it basically tells the body when to start puberty. From study 2 found below, we can see that in an independent study of over 4,000 women if the major allele of LIN28B is expressed, the menarche occurs earlier by at least 0.1 years, which results in earlier puberty, which leads to eventual less adult height. The ScienceDaily article is based on study 3 found below. The SNP testing of the region around the LIN28B shows it correlated to the timing of growth spurts.

From Science Daily….

Growth Curve Analyses of Finnish Population Shed Light On the Genetic Regulation of Growth in Height

ScienceDaily (Apr. 15, 2010) — Researchers at the University of Helsinki and the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM) have shown that a gene called LIN28B strongly influences height growth from birth to adulthood in a complex and sex-spesific manner.

Human growth in height is a multifaceted process including periods of accelerated and decelerated growth velocities. The postnatal growth trajectory can be conceptualized as consisting of three partially overlapping phases: infant growth characterized by rapidly declining growth velocities, slowly decelerating childhood growth, and the pubertal height growth spurt.

Height is strongly regulated by genes, and so far more than 40 genes have been implicated influencing adult height. Yet, little is known about how individual genes regulate growth in height.

Utilizing the unique resource of longitudinal childhood height growth data available in Finnish population cohorts, researchers at the University of Helsinki and the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM) have pinpointed broad height growth regulating effects to a gene called LIN28B. The same gene is known to be a key regulator of developmental timing in the nematode C. elegans and has previously been associated both with timing of menarche and adult height in humans.

Applying genome-wide association mapping technology, the researchers have now shown that the gene strongly influences the timing of the pubertal height growth spurt both in males and females but they also found that it regulates height growth from birth to adulthood in a complex and sex-specific manner.

“Interestingly; two separate variants of the gene were found to influence growth, one with a more prominent height increasing effect in males and another one increasing height only in females,” tells Academy Research Fellow, Dr. Elisabeth Widén.

Share this story on FacebookTwitter, and Google:

Journal Reference:

  1. Elisabeth Widén , Samuli Ripatti , Diana L. Cousminer , Ida Surakka , Tuuli Lappalainen , Marjo-Riitta Järvelin , Johan G. Eriksson , Olli Raitakari , Veikko Salomaa , Ulla Sovio , Anna-Liisa Hartikainen , Anneli Pouta , Mark I. McCarthy , Clive Osmond , Eero Kajantie , Terho Lehtimäki , Jorma Viikari , Mika Kähönen , Chris Tyler-Smith , Nelson Freimer , Joel N. Hirschhorn , Leena Peltonen and Aarno Palotie.Distinct Variants at LIN28B Influence Growth in Height from Birth to AdulthoodAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2010; DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.03.010
From Nature.com (study 2) HERE

Nature Genetics 41, 729 – 733 (2009)
Published online: 17 May 2009 | doi:10.1038/ng.382

Genetic variation in LIN28B is associated with the timing of puberty

Ken K Ong1,2,3, Cathy E Elks1,2, Shengxu Li1,2, Jing Hua Zhao1,2, Jian’an Luan1,2, Lars B Andersen4, Sheila A Bingham5,6, Soren Brage1,2, George Davey Smith7, Ulf Ekelund1,2,8, Christopher J Gillson1,2, Beate Glaser7, Jean Golding9, Rebecca Hardy10, Kay-Tee Khaw11, Diana Kuh10, Robert Luben11, Michele Marcus12,13,14, Michael A McGeehin12, Andrew R Ness15, Kate Northstone16, Susan M Ring16, Carol Rubin12, Matthew A Sims1,2, Kijoung Song17, David P Strachan18, Peter Vollenweider19, Gerard Waeber19, Dawn M Waterworth17, Andrew Wong10, Panagiotis Deloukas20, Inês Barroso20, Vincent Mooser17, Ruth J Loos1,2 & Nicholas J Wareham1,2

The timing of puberty is highly variable1. We carried out a genome-wide association study for age at menarche in 4,714 women and report an association in LIN28B on chromosome 6 (rs314276, minor allele frequency (MAF) = 0.33, P = 1.5 × 10−8). In independent replication studies in 16,373 women, each major allele was associated with 0.12 years earlier menarche (95% CI = 0.08–0.16;P = 2.8 × 10−10; combined P = 3.6 × 10−16). This allele was also associated with earlier breast development in girls (P = 0.001; N = 4,271); earlier voice breaking (P = 0.006, N = 1,026) and more advanced pubic hair development in boys (P = 0.01; N = 4,588); a faster tempo of height growth in girls (P = 0.00008; N = 4,271) and boys (P = 0.03; N = 4,588); and shorter adult height in women (P = 3.6 × 10−7N = 17,274) and men (P = 0.006; N = 9,840) in keeping with earlier growth cessation. These studies identify variation in LIN28B, a potent and specific regulator of microRNA processing2, as the first genetic determinant regulating the timing of human pubertal growth and development.

From PubMed study 2 link HERE

Am J Hum Genet. 2010 May 14;86(5):773-82. Epub 2010 Apr 15.

Distinct variants at LIN28B influence growth in height from birth to adulthood.

Widén E, Ripatti S, Cousminer DL, Surakka I, Lappalainen T, Järvelin MR, Eriksson JG, Raitakari O, Salomaa V, Sovio U, Hartikainen AL, Pouta A, McCarthy MI,Osmond C, Kajantie E, Lehtimäki T, Viikari J, Kähönen M, Tyler-Smith C, Freimer N, Hirschhorn JN, Peltonen L, Palotie A.

Source

Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. elisabeth.widen@helsinki.fi

Abstract

We have studied the largely unknown genetic underpinnings of height growth by using a unique resource of longitudinal childhood height data available in Finnish population cohorts. After applying GWAS mapping of potential genes influencing pubertal height growth followed by further characterization of the genetic effects on complete postnatal growth trajectories, we have identified strong association between variants near LIN28B and pubertal growth (rs7759938; female p = 4.0 x 10(-9), male p = 1.5 x 10(-4), combined p = 5.0 x 10(-11), n = 5038). Analysis of growth during early puberty confirmed an effect on the timing of the growth spurt. Correlated SNPs have previously been implicated as influencing both adult stature and age at menarche, the same alleles associating with taller height and later age of menarche in other studies as with later pubertal growth here. Additionally, a partially correlated LIN28B SNP, rs314277, has been associated previously with final height. Testing both rs7759938 and rs314277 (pairwise r(2) = 0.29) for independent effects on postnatal growth in 8903 subjects indicated that the pubertal timing-associated marker rs7759938 affects prepubertal growth in females (p = 7 x 10(-5)) and final height in males (p = 5 x 10(-4)), whereas rs314277 has sex-specific effects on growth (p for interaction = 0.005) that were distinct from those observed at rs7759938. In conclusion, partially correlated variants at LIN28B tag distinctive, complex, and sex-specific height-growth-regulating effects, influencing the entire period of postnatal growth. These findings imply a critical role for LIN28B in the regulation of human growth.

Copyright (c) 2010 The American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PMID: 20398887        [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE] 
PMCID:    PMC2869010

Using Dexamethasone And TGF-Beta1 To Turn Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells Into Chondrocytes

Me: What this study has shown is another method to turn bone marrow derived mesenchymal progenitor cells. Remember, this is not for adiposed derived adult stem cells, but bone marrow drived mesenchymal progenitor cells. There is a difference, and if I do try to use growth factor combinations to induce height increase, we have to know how the process should happen. This study involved trying out the two growth factors dexamethasone and TGF-Beta1. With the deaxamethasone we are seeing some developed of chondrogenesis as well as collagen type II formation. With time, the type II turns into type X from the obvious differentiation of the chondrocytes into hypertrophic in nature. Besides just using the dexamethasone some TGF-Beta 1 was also added which resulted in call cell culture samples undergoing chondrogenesis. There is an increase in the alkaline phosphatase activity. there is evidence for collagen type II a and type II b and type X. interestingly, type I collagen mRNA is no longer detected.

What this implies: In three of the most recent posts I have looked at the effectiveness of using TGF-1, BMP-3, Dexamethasone, and Chitosan. You can encapsulate the BMP-6, TGF-Beta 1 with Chitosan, and the TGF-Beta 1 with dexamethasone. We are finding like from other studies that the TGF-1 (or TGF-2) works very well with other types of chondroinductive material. I would suggest than first just sending in the TGF-1 with chitosan, then add in the deaxamethasone, and then the BMP-6. It would be interesting to see what would be the result if we tried to multiply the chondrogenetic qualities of all of these growth factors together. With the dexamethasone we should be able to add this into the epiphysis and not just the bone marrow.

From PubMed study link HERE

Exp Cell Res. 1998 Jan 10;238(1):265-72.

In vitro chondrogenesis of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells.

Johnstone B, Hering TM, Caplan AI, Goldberg VM, Yoo JU.

Source

Skeletal Research Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA. bxj9@po.cwru.edu

Abstract

A culture system that facilitates the chondrogenic differentiation of rabbit bone marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells has been developed. Cells obtained in bone marrow aspirates were first isolated by monolayer culture and then transferred into tubes and allowed to form three-dimensional aggregates in a chemically defined medium. The inclusion of 10(-7) M dexamethasone in the medium induced chondrogenic differentiation of cells within the aggregate as evidenced by the appearance of toluidine blue metachromasia and the immunohistochemical detection of type II collagen as early as 7 days after beginning three-dimensional culture. After 21 days, the matrix of the entire aggregate contained type II collagen. By 14 days of culture, there was also evidence for type X collagen present in the matrix and the cells morphologically resembled hypertrophic chondrocytes. However, chondrogenic differentiation was achieved in only approximately 25% of the marrow cell preparations used. In contrast, with the addition of transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1), chondrogenesis was induced in all marrow cell preparations, with or without the presence of 10(-7) M dexamethasone. The induction of chondrogenesis was accompanied by an increase in the alkaline phosphatase activity of the aggregated cells. The results of RT-PCR experiments indicated that both type IIA and IIB collagen mRNAs were detected by 7 days postaggregation as was mRNA for type X collagen. Conversely, the expression of the type I collagen mRNA was detected in the preaggregate cells but was no longer detectable at 7 days after aggregation. These results provide histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular evidence for the in vitro chondrogenic differentiation of adult mammalian progenitor cells derived from bone marrow.

PMID: 9457080    [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

A Detailed Study And Analysis On Growth Differentiation Factors GDFs Which Influence Growth And Height

One group of growth factors which seem to really come up a lot in the research besides the bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are the Growth Differentiation Factors (GDFs). The GDFs in general a a sub-group of the larger TGF-Beta superfamily of growth factors which have some role in development with around 30 combined total elements found so far.

In the past we saw that some GDFS, like GDF-5 and GDF-2 seem to have pro chondrogenic properties. From the wikipedia article on Growth Differentiation Factors I find that there is a GDF 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 15. Of the chart in the article, I would guess that the GDF2,3,5, and 10 are the most important ones for bone formation and development so these will be the only GDFs I will be focusing and doing any type of research on for the post. GDF2 is also known as BMP-9, GDF3 is also known as VGR-2, GDF10 is also known as BMP-3b.


GDF-5

From the R&D Systems website I would learn further about the functions and nature of the GDF-5…

“…It can be secreted by precartilagenous mesenchymal condensations involved in the formation of digits. It is also produced by fibroblasts, articular cartilage chondrocytes, and odontoblasts. GDF-5 actions may be mediated by the TGF-beta superfamily receptors ALK-6, BMP-RII, or Act-RII.

This would suggest that it is secreted in the earlier stages of pre-natal embryo and fetal development since the fingers and toes are grown from their release. As for the fibroblasts and the articular cartilage chondrocytes, it shows that the GDF probably has not just some bone cell function, but also cartilage cell function. From the Medical Dictionary website I would learn that odontoblasts are “one of the connective tissue cells that deposit dentin and form the outer surface of the dental pulp”

The R&D Systems website would be more helpful in explaining the importance and influence of at least the GDF-5…

“The majority of GDF-5 research has centered on embryogenesis and on the development of joints in particular. GDF-5 has an apparent role in the formation of some synovial joints of the digits. GDF-5 may contribute to the formation of the early cartilage mass by promoting mesenchymal transformation to cartilage”

This suggest that while the entire array of functions of GDF-5 may not have been completely discovered, there is a lot of evidence in showing the link between GDF-5 and the development of joints. It seems that the synovial joints require this growth factor. At least for embryos and developing fetuses, the GDF-5 seems to be get the initial cartilage to form from mesenchymal stem cells. For our height increase interest, this shows that maybe it is possible still for fully mature grown up adults to get GDF-5 into their bone marrow to cause some cartilage formation as well.

Further on…

“Finally, after formation of the synovial cavity (see Figure 1c), GDF-5 may direct tendon and ligament formation around the joint, and induce cartilage expansion (thus bone lengthening) in the residual cartilage of bones associated with the synovial joint”

This shows that the GDF-5 has a way of directing the direction and arrangement of other tissue formation and postioning around the synovial joint, which it also has a influence on development on. It may appear that it would be the GDF-5 that is the real growth factor cause for endochondral ossification in the first place. The sentence suggest directly that the entire reason the cartilage even expands in the first place is from the action of GDF-5.


GDF-3

From a database on the National Institute Of Health website as a summary it states…

“The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) family and the TGF-beta superfamily. This group of proteins is characterized by a polybasic proteolytic processing site which is cleaved to produce a mature protein containing seven conserved cysteine residues. The members of this family are regulators of cell growth and differentiation in both embryonic and adult tissues.”

The summary is not that useful but as for function I refer to the study “Mutation of the bone morphogenetic protein GDF3 causes ocular and skeletal anomalies.” The study suggest that the GDF-3 has at least some involvement in the development in some of the eye parts. When the GDF-3 creating gene is removed from tested animals, there is clear signs of development maladies. From paper “GDF6, a novel locus for a spectrum of ocular developmental anomalies.” it would seem that the GDF-6 besides the GDF-3 also has a role in ocular development.

From paper “Growth differentiation factor 3 is induced by bone morphogenetic protein 6 (BMP-6) and BMP-7 and increases luteinizing hormone receptor messenger RNA expression in human granulosa cells.” I would learn that it is possible to induce GDF-3 with BMP-6 or BMP-7 and that it has an inhibitory effect on the BMP cytokines. This idea would by validated by paper “GDF3, a BMP inhibitor, regulates cell fate in stem cells and early embryos.” What is startling from the short abstract is to learn that in both mouse and human stem cells, the GDF-3 is expressed a lot by the stem cells in pluripotent form. The conclusion give us another clue on maybe how to reverse or at least hold off on the differentiation process of stem cells so we can control how it changes over time.

Furthermore, we use gain- and reduction-of-function to show that in a species-specific manner, GDF3 regulates both of the two major characteristics of embryonic stem cells: the ability to maintain the undifferentiated state and the ability to differentiate into the full spectrum of cell types.

From paper “GDF3 at the crossroads of TGF-beta signaling.” we again see that the GDF-3 has a huge influence on undifferentiated embryonic stem cells which are still pluripotent in nature. The researchers conclude with “Chen and colleagues found that GDF-3 acts as a nodal-like TGF-beta ligand. These combined findings raise the intriguing possibility that GDF-3 acts as a bi-functional protein, to regulate the balance between the two modes of TGF-beta signaling.”

This raises the point that it seems to both help and inhibit many different types of growth factors in the TGF-Beta superfamily. It regulates a balance, so it can get the TGF-Beta groups to either increase or decrease. Like the GDF-5, it is becoming more and more clear that it has a huge influence on very early development and can be one of the keys to determining whether one’s height will be tall or short.


GDF-2

As for the sub-unit the growth differentiation factor 2, aka BMP-9 I used the source Wikigenes to get my information. From the sources posted it does seem that the GDF-2 aka BMP-9 has some chondrogenesis abilities. It also has some osteogenic abilities since rats bred without the GDF-2 encoded gene did inhibit some osteogenic development problems.


GDF-10

From the list of GDF-s on the original wikipedia chart, I have decided only to research and evaluate the research importance of GDF-5, 2, 3, and 10 since they seem to have some roles and involvement in the bones and cartilage development. Many of the other GDFs are involved in neuron or muscular development. For the GDF-10 element, again I would use its Wikigenes profile page as the only source for reference. It looks credible and well researched, even if the creation of the page did not involve combing through every single PubMed study ever linked or mentions the GDF-10 sub-unit. The GDF-10 seems to be very much related to the BMP-3 so it is also named BMP-3b.

The first major claim made by the site is during embryogenesis the GDF-10 has a role in formation of the bones in the skull and the vertebrate. As for the biological context of the GDF-10 we find that it has multiple roles in the cell differentiation for the formation of the skeletal structure. The mRNA for it is found in both prenatal and post natal individual’s bones.

There is a 2nd Wikigenes page on the GDF-10 where more genetic related information is found which I didn’t go through.

GDF-9

There is a Wikigenes page for GDF-9. From some studies off of PudMed HERE I would learn that the GDF-9 has function in female ovary, non mature egg development. They are secreted by oocytes in growing ovarian follicles.

From a paper on GDF-9 “Growth differentiation factor-9 is required during early ovarian folliculogenesis”  I would learn that at least one of the functions of the GDF-9 is required for ovarian folliculogenesis. The researchers conclude their abstract with…”GDF-9 is the first oocyte-derived growth factor required for somatic cell function in vivo.”

It would seem that even with its Wikipedia article, there is no mention of any development with bones or cartilage


Conclusion:

Overall the entire group of Growth Differentiation Factors has a major influence on the development process of every single type of cell in the body. It has been rather difficult in being able to separate and identify the specific GDF types which only focus on the development of either the bone or cartilage. Most of the GDFs have multiple functions.

However there are some studies which show that at least one of the GDF really has a direct influence on endochondral ossification and human growth. From the paper “Mechanisms of GDF-5 action during skeletal development” we would learn that transgenic mice that has their ability to recieve GDF removed showed many different types of genetic disorders of the limbs including chondrodysplasia. There is shortening of the appendicular skeleton and also either no or abnormal development of the joints. From Wikipedia I would learn that the term “appendicular skeleton” actually refers to the bones that make up the limbs aka appendages. This means all the bones in the torso, neck , and head are not part of the appendicular skeleton. The researchers decided to test to see how important the GDF-5 is in skeletal development. They took young chickens and overexpressed the gene that makes this protein. The result is that the overall skeletal length or amount of skeleton increased by 37.5% which is contributed to increases in the number of chondrocytes. For this nearly amazing growth factor, the researchers say it can do all these functions.

GDF-5 can…

  • Increase the size of the early cartilage condensation and the later developing skeletal element
  • Increases chondrogenesis in a dose-dependent manner.
  • Might act at these stages by increasing cell adhesion, a critical determinant of early chondrogenesis
  • At later stages of skeletal development GDF-5 can increase proliferation of chondrocytes
  • In controlling the size of skeletal elements and provides a possible explanation for the variation in the severity of skeletal defects resulting from mutations in GDF-5.

At this point I am going to focus almost all of my research on the Growth Differentiation Factors on the GDF-5 and a little on GDF-3. What I might even suggest at this stage is that the GDF-5 may be one of the most critical elements in our research.

Methods To Differentiate Adipose Derived Stem Cells Into The Chondrogenic Phenotype

Me: This post will be critical and super important because it really does show the height increase seeker just which types of growth hormone combinations and mixtures will lead to the best and most optimum levels of chondrogenesis. Once of the biggest challenges and questions I had in my past self derived methods on height increase was what the growth factor combination should be. I had originally thought of the idea of injecting implants of slow releasing capsule stilled with growth factors in a series, similar to how the cocktail formula vaccine approach was done for HIV. However, I was not sure which BMPs and GDFs should go where. This will definitely push the effort and endeavor a big step forward.

It also contains actual step by step instruction on how to isolate and extract adipose derived stem cells from a subject and how to use basic chemistry lab techniques to form the chondrocytes. This may be a neccesary step in being able to test and apply any proposed ideas.

What this post does is to show what would be the actual reagents and procedure steps needed to differentiate adipose derived stem cells into the chondrogenic phenotype and then cartilage. I would guess the amount of equipment and materials needed would run up to $5-10K and the entire procedure would take 10-12 weeks. Of course at the very end you must do histological, immunohistological, and immunochemical testing to see how well was the overall yield.

From the full text of PubMed study link HERE

Nat Protoc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 November 17.
Published in final edited form as:
Nat Protoc. 2010 July; 5(7): 1294–1311.

Published online 2010 June 17. doi:  10.1038/nprot.2010.81

PMCID: PMC3219531
NIHMSID: NIHMS312303

Isolation of adipose derived stem cells and their induction to a chondrogenic phenotype

Bradley T. Estes, Brian O. Diekman, Jeffrey M. Gimble,** and Farshid Guilak*
Author information ► Copyright and License information ►
The publisher’s final edited version of this article is available at Nat Protoc
See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.

Summary

The ability to isolate, expand, and differentiate adult stem cells into a chondrogenic lineage is an important step in the development of tissue engineering approaches for cartilage repair or regeneration for the treatment of joint injury or osteoarthritis, or for application in plastic or reconstructive surgery. Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) provide an abundant and easily accessible source of adult stem cells for use in such regenerative approaches. This protocol describes the isolation of ASCs from liposuction aspirate, as well as cell culture conditions for growth factor based induction of ASCs into chondrocyte-like cells. These methods are similar to those used for bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells but distinct due to the unique properties of ASCs. Investigators can expect consistent ASC differentiation, allowing for slight variation due to donor and serum lot effects. Approximately 10–12 weeks are needed for ASC isolation and the characterization of chondrocyte-like cells, which is also described.

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of pathologies in articular and elastic cartilage pose important unmet challenges to the medical community. For example, arthritis represents the most common cause of disability in the US, leading to joint pain and dysfunction in over 40 million Americans 1, 2 Osteoarthritis, the most common form of arthritis, involves degeneration of the articular cartilage, the smooth, load-bearing tissue lining the ends of long bones within the synovial joints of the body. The greatest risk factors for osteoarthritis include aging, obesity, joint trauma, and mutations in cartilage specific matrix proteins 3. Current estimates on the treatment costs, both indirect and direct, of osteoarthritis in the US are escalating to greater than $65 billion annually 4. For plastic and reconstructive surgery in the head and neck area, elastic cartilage is often needed for nose, ear, and trachea reconstruction 5. Estimates in the number of procedures involving bone and cartilage replacement exceed one million procedures per year 6.

Cartilage Properties and Current Treatment Options

The unique function and properties of cartilage are provided by the tissue’s extracellular matrix, which is maintained by a population of cells known as chondrocytes. Due to the small volume of chondrocytes (2–5% by volume), as well as the avascular and aneural properties of the tissue, cartilage exhibits little to no intrinsic repair capabilities in response to injury or disease. Traditional efforts to treat cartilage damage include joint lavage, tissue debridement, microfracture of the subchondral bone, abrasion arthroplasty, or the transplantation of autologous or allogeneic osteochondral grafts 7–17. While these procedures have yielded promising clinical results, they are generally not applicable for large cartilage defects or for degenerative joint diseases such as osteoarthritis 18–20. One tissue engineering approach, autologous chondrocyte transplantation, has shown promising results in early clinical reports, 21, 22 but recent randomized, controlled trials suggest little difference in the efficacy of this procedure over microfracture of the subchondral bone 23. In this regard, there has been significant interest in the development of new tissue engineering strategies for the repair or replacement of damaged or diseased cartilage, and integral to such approaches is the need for an abundant and easily accessible source of cells. While most early attempts at cartilage tissue engineering have relied on the use of primary differentiated chondrocytes, it is important to note that there are many issues associated with the harvest of autologous tissue and cells for repair of cartilage. Among these are the disease state of the harvested cells (from the inflamed joint), the potential for initiation of osteoarthritic changes in the joint 23, 24, the lack of adequate autogenous tissue, and difficulty in expanding the cells ex vivo while maintaining the chondrocyte phenotype 25, 26. These issues provide significant barriers for the use of autogenous primary chondrocytes for successful cartilage repair treatment strategies. Currently, defects in the head and neck area are typically treated with autologous cartilage, usually harvested from costal cartilage grafts 27. Advantageously, the use of autologous tissues presents an implant that can be formed in the correct anatomical shape without risk of immunological rejection. However, the limitations and potential disadvantages of autologous tissue use are noteworthy and include lack of available tissue for large defects, the risk of iatrogenic deformity, and significant donor-site morbidity 27, 28.

Stem Cells in Cartilage Repair

The use of adult stem cells presents a viable alternative for cartilage repair strategies and has the potential for success while avoiding the issues associated with autogenous grafts andor cells. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from bone marrow have been shown to possesses multilineage differentiation potential and have been characterized extensively for a variety of tissue engineering applications including chondrogenesis 29–31. Another multipotent adult stem cell population, adipose derived stem cells (ASCs), can easily be obtained from liposuction waste 32, 33 and has been shown in numerous studies to exhibit the potential for chondrogenesis, osteogenesis, adipogenesis, myogenesis, and some aspects of neurogenesis 34–45. While these cells show some similarities to bone marrow MSCs, they appear to have a number of distinct characteristics with respect to their cell surface markers, differentiation potential, and abundance in the body. For example, compared to 100 ml of bone marrow aspirate, up to 300-fold more stem cells can be obtained from 100 g of adipose tissue 31, 46.

ASCs have demonstrated significant potential for chondrogenic differentiation when expanded in appropriate monolayer conditions 47 and cultured in growth factor containing medium in 3D culture34–36, 43, 45. As it was originally hypothesized that ASCs were another source of MSCs, similar conditions used to induce chondrogenesis in MSCs 31 were employed for the ASC population 36, 43. In optimizing ASC differentiation protocols, it was later discovered that other members of the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) superfamily, such as bone morphogenetic protein 6 (BMP-6), can serve as potent regulators of ASC chondrogenesis 45, 48. In general, chondrogenesis requires a three-dimensional culture system, and ASCs can be successfully induced down a chondrogenic lineage in a variety of scaffold environments. These culture configurations include pellet culture, which takes advantage of cell-cell interactions in a similar fashion to condensation during cartilage development 49, alginate bead culture which employs an inert hydrogel to facilitate a rounded cell phenotype advantageous for chondrogenesis 36, and cartilage-derived matrix which seeks to recapitulate some of the cell-matrix interactions seen in native cartilage 50, 51.

To repair or regenerate articular cartilage, an understanding of the molecular constituents and their role in the mechanical function of cartilage must be taken into consideration. Articular cartilage provides joint congruity and a lubricated surface for articulation, effectively distributing loads of up to ten times body weight that pass through the joint during normal physiologic activity 52. Remarkably, this tissue provides a nearly frictionless bearing surface for the joint and functions over decades of use with little or no wear under normal circumstances. Articular cartilage is > 60% collagen by dry weight 52, 53, primarily consisting of collagen type II with lesser amounts of other collagens (e.g., Types VI, IX, X, and XI). The collagen fibrils are located throughout the matrix and are intertwined with a highly concentrated negatively charged proteoglycan matrix 54, 55. Two primary glycosaminoglycans (GAG) are found in articular cartilage, chondroitin sulfate and keratin sulfate. GAG side chains (polymer repeats of the sulfated molecule) are found assembled covalently to a protein core to form a proteolgycan aggregate (reviewed in 54). The large aggregating proteoglycan, aggrecan, is assembled into a complex structure by a noncovalent linkage of these proteoglycan aggregates to a hyaluronate backbone, producing immobilized structures contributing to the articular cartilage solid matrix 53. The assembly of the cartilage matrix gives the tissue its unique set of biomechanical properties by virtue of the ability of the collagen-proteoglycan matrix together with the interstitial fluid to effectively resist high levels of stress and strain engendered by normal loading of the joint. While creating a true mimic of articular cartilage may not be necessary for proper function, a tissue possessing similar molecular constituents will most likely possess similar mechanical properties. Thus, monitoring the assembly and spatial organization of key extracellular matrix components is an important step in the development of tissue-engineered cartilage implants.

Markers of Chondrogenesis

Herein, we report the methods for ASC isolation and expansion, scaffold preparation, encapsulation of cells, and biochemical conditions to induce chondrogenesis. See Figure 1 for a flow chart showing the procedure and associated timing information. We further report methods used to evaluate the degree of chondrogenic differentiation in 3D culture (Table 1).

Figure 1

Figure 1
Flow chart for experiments with associated timing
Table 1

Table 1
Assaysto determine ASC chondrogenesis

Controls

We have previously shown that only 43% of ASCs at a clonal level are capable of chondrogenic differentiation 37. Because of this, it is relatively straightforward to select cells that have both high and low chondrogenic differentiation potential, which can be used for positive and negative controls respectively. Also, in most circumstances, ASCs can be cultured in a control medium without growth factors to serve as a negative control 45, 51, 56, 57. Specifically, as relates to histology and immunohistochemistry, sections of articular cartilage should be used as positive controls to assess the degree of chondrogenic differentiation of the tissue engineered constructs.

Appropriate Selection of an ASC Culture System

In this protocol, we describe two commonly used 3D culture systems that can be employed to chondrogenically induce ASCs. While both of these culture systems have been successfully used for ASC chondrogenesis, the selection of one over the other depends highly on the study purposes. The use of pellet culture results in high spatial cell density and necessitates cell-cell contact, much like the cellular condensation process during limb development 49. The use of alginate results in a rounded cell morphology, much like that observed in articular cartilage, which has also been shown to be an important factor in promoting ASC chondrogenesis 36. The use of pellet culture mimics the development of cartilage during limb formation and is therefore often used as a method to understand the interaction of cells and growth and environmental factors to promote a chondrogenic phenotype 37, 48, 58, 59. While alginate can also be used for this purpose 35, 36, 51, 56, 60, the use of alginate and other hydrogels can have profound influences on the ensuing phenotype of the cells, 35, 50, 61 and therefore, the effect of the biomaterial as a significant variable influencing the differentiation potential of the cells must be taken into account when choosing an appropriate culture system. It is also important to note that while we report on the methods for two often used cell culture systems, many other materials and culture systems have been reported for being supportive of ASC chondrogenesis 35, 50, 62 and should also be considered when selecting an ASC culture system. Regardless of the culture system employed, the methods for inducing chondrogenesis with the growth factors listed in Table 3 may still serve as a common starting ground for ASC chondrogenesis.

Table 5

Table 5
Growth Factor Combinations for ASC chondrogenesis*

MATERIALS

REAGENTS

 

Cell isolation and expansion

  • Adipose tissue (contains blood)
    Caution. See note below step 4 for guidelines in dealing with human tissue.
  • 5, 10, and 25 ml serological Pipettes, sterile (Corning, cat. Nos. 4487, 4488, and 4489 respectively)
  • 250 ml plastic bottles for centrifuging, sterile (Corning, cat. No. CLS430236)
  • 50 mL polypropylene centrifuge tubes, sterile, (Corning, cat. No. 430290)
  • 2 1L beakers, sterile
  • 10% (v/v) bleach
    Caution. Corrosive. Causes eye, skin, and digestive tract burns. Harmful if inhaled and results in respiratory tract irritation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • 70% (v/v) ethanol
    Caution Ethanol is highly flammable. May also cause eye and respiratory tract irritation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • 10% (v/v) dish washing detergent
  • Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (D-PBS), without calcium chloride and magnesium chloride (Gibco, cat. no. 14190-144)
  • BSA, Fraction V, 7.5% solution (Gibco, cat. No. 15260-037)
  • Type I Collagenase (Worthington Biochemical Products, cat. No. LS004197)
    Critical: We advise testing several lots of collagenase to insure effective digestion of the adipose tissue. There is significant variability between lots provided by a single commercial vendor.
  • 1 M calcium chloride solution (sterile)
  • 250 ml filter 0.22 μm low protein binding sterilization unit (Corning, cat. no. 430767)
  • 225cm2 Cell Culture Flask (Corning, cat. no. 431082)
  • Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium/Ham’s F-12 Nutrient Broth (1:1. v/v) with 15 mM HEPES buffer, L-glutamine and pyridoxine hydrochloride (Gibco, Cat. No. 11330-032 or Biowhittaker, Cat No. 12-719F)
  • Ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) (Sigma, cat. No. A0171)
  • Potassium carbonate (K2CO3) (Sigma, cat. No. P5833)
    Caution. Causes eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation. Harmful if swallowed. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • Fetal Bovine Serum (Atlas Biologicals, Cat. No. F-0500-A)
    Critical: We advise testing several lots of serum for culture optimization, and then use of the same lot of FBS for an entire series of experiments. The authors have observed significant variability in the results obtained with different sera.
  • 0.05% Trypsin/EDTA (Gibco, Cat. No. 15140-122)
  • Penicillin/Streptomycin/Fungizone (Gibco, Cat. No. 15240-062)
  • Human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF) (Roche, Cat. No. 1376454)
  • Human fibroblastic growth factor, basic (rh-bFGF) (Roche, Cat. No. 1123149)
  • Transforming Growth Factor beta-1 TGF-β1 (R&D Systems, Cat. No. 100-B-001)
  • Cryogenic Vials (Corning, cat. No. 430488)
  • Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) Hybri-Max® (Sigma, Cat. No. D2650)
    Caution Harmful if swallowed, inhaled, or absorbed through skin. Causes eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • 1°C Freezing Container (Nalgene, Cat. No. 5100-0001))

 

Alginate bead culture

  • Alginate (Pronova LVG USP, Cat. No. 4200001)
  • Sodium Chloride (NaCl) (Sigma, Cat. No. S9625)
  • Sodium Citrate Trisodium salt dihydrate (Sigma, Cat. No. S4641)
  • Calcium Chloride (Sigma, Cat. No. C3306)
  • Sterile Syringe filter (0.22 mm) (VWR International, Cat. No. 28145-477)
  • 150 ml 0.22 mm filter system Corning, Cat. No. 431154).
  • 24 well plate, with lid, flat bottom, Ultra-low attachment surface (Corning, Cat. No. 29443-032)
  • VWR Spinbar® Micro stir bars (12.7 mm × 3 mm) (VWR International, Cat. No. 58948-397)

 

Chondrogenic Induction

  • Dulbecco’s Modified Eagles Medium-high glucose, (DMEM-HG), (Gibco, Cat. No. 11995-065)
  • ITS+ supplement, (Collaborative Research, Cat. No. 40352)
  • Dexamethasone, (Sigma, Cat. No. D-4032)
  • L-Ascorbic acid 2-phosphate Sesquimagnesium Salt (Sigma, Cat. No. A8960)
  • Penicillin/Streptomycin (Gibco, cat. No. 15140-122)
  • Transforming Growth Factor beta-3 (TGF-β3), (R&D Systems, Cat. No. 243-B3-002)
  • Bone Morphogenetic Protein-6 (BMP-6), (R&D Systems, Cat. No. 507-BP-020)
  • Siliconized 200 μl Pipette tips (VWR, Cat. No. 53503-792)
  • Siliconized 0.6 mL Snap-Cap microtubes (Sigma, Cat. No. T4691-500EA)
  • 15 mL polypropylene centrifuge tubes, sterile, (Corning, cat. No. 430052)
  • 50 mL polypropylene centrifuge tubes, sterile, (Corning, cat. No. 430290)

 

Papain Digestion solution

  • L-Cysteine Hydrochloride Anhydrous (Sigma, Cat. No. C1276)
    Caution. Avoid contact. Causes eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, EDTA (Sigma, Cat. No. EDS-100G)
    Caution. Avoid contact. Causes eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • Papain, 0.5 U/mg (Sigma, Cat. No. 76222)
    Caution. Avoid contact. Causes eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • Sodium phosphate monobasic (Mallinckrodt, Cat. No. 7892)
    Caution. Avoid contact. Causes eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)

 

dsDNA Quantitation

  • PicoGreen dsDNA Quantitation kit (Invitrogen, Cat. No. P-7589)

 

DMB Assay

  • Sodium Formate (Sigma, Cat. no. S2140)
    Caution. Harmful if swallowed or inhaled. Causes eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • 1,9-Dimethyl-Methylene Blue (Sigma, Cat # 341088, Sigma)
    Caution. Known eye irritant. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves and safety glasses and allow for adequate ventilation.)
  • Chondroitin 4-sulfate (C-4-S, type A – from Bovine Trachea) (Calbiochem, Cat. No. 230687)
  • Formic Acid (EM Science, Cat. No. FX 0440-7)
    Caution. Harmful if swallowed or inhaled. Causes eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • Clear, flat-bottom 96-well plate (BD, Cat. No. 353228)

 

Hydroxyproline assay

  • Chloramine-T, hydrate 98% (Sigma, Cat. No. 857319)
    Caution. Harmful if inhaled. Substance is known to be destructive to the tissue of the mucous membranes and upper respiratory tract. Also causes eye and skin burns and may be harmful if swallowed. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • n-Propyl alcohol 1 L (Sigma, Cat. No. P6334)
    Caution. n-Propyl alcohol is highly flammable. Harmful if swallowed or inhaled or absorbed through skin. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • p-Dimethylaminobenzaldehyde (Sigma, Cat. No. D8904)
  • Perchloric Acid 60% 1 lb (Fisher Scientific, Cat. No. A228)
    Caution. Harmful if swallowed or inhaled. Strong oxidizer. Corrosive. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood that is not designed for other uses.)
  • Citric Acid Monohydrate (Sigma, Cat. No. C1909)
    Caution. Known eye irritant; results in severe eye irritation and possible injury. Also causes skin and respiratory tract irritation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • Sodium acetate Trihydrate (Sigma, Cat. No. S9513)
  • Sodium Hydroxide Pellets (Mallinckrodt, Cat. No. 7708)
    Caution. Highly corrosive. Can result in eye and skin burns. May also result in respiratory and/or digestive tract irritation with possible burns. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • Acetic Acid Glacial (EM Science, Cat. No. UN 2789)
    Caution. Highly corrosive and flammable. Can result in severe burns to all body tissue and may be fatal if swallowed. Inhalation may cause lung and tooth damage. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • Hydrochloric Acid, 37% (6.0 N) (EM Science, Cat. No. UN1789)
    Caution. Highly corrosive. Can result in severe burns to all body tissue and may be fatal if swallowed or inhaled. Inhalation may cause lung damage. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • trans-4 hydroxyproline-L (Sigma, Cat. No. H54409)
  • Activated Charcoal Powder (EM Science, Cat. No. CX0645-1)
  • 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes (VWR, Cat. No. 20170-038)
  • Costar Spin-X HPLC micro centrifuge tube (nonsterile) and filter (0.45 μm nylon filter) (Corning, Cat. No. 8170)

 Fixation

  • 16% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Cat. No. 15710)
    Caution. Paraformaldehyde is a suspected carcinogen. Avoid contact and inhalation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • Sodium Cacodylate, Trihydrate (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Cat. No. 12300)
    Caution. May be fatal if swallowed or inhaled. Harmful if absorbed through skin. Contains arsenic which can cause cancer. Skin, eye, and respiratory tract irritant. (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • Barium chloride (Mallinckrodt, Cat. No. 3756)
    Caution. Known irritant. May cause eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation. May be fatal if swallowed or inhaled. Avoid contact and inhalation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)

Histology

  • Xylene (Mallinckrodt, Cat. No. 8668-16)
    Caution. Harmful or fatal if swallowed. Causes severe eye irritation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • Paraplast® Tissue Embedding Medium (Fisher Scientific, Cat. No. 23-021-399)
    Caution Paraffin burns readily. Keep away from fire.
  • Tissue-Tek® Uni-Cassette® LWS (Sakura, Cat. No. 4156-02)
  • Fisherbrand® Superfrost®/Plus Microscope Slides (Fisher Scientific, Cat. No. 12-550-15)
  • Safranin-O (Sigma, Cat. No. HT90432-1L)
    Caution. Causes eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation. Avoid contact and inhalation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask).
  • Toluidine blue (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. no. 89640-5G)
    Caution May cause gastrointestinal and blood disorders. Avoid contact and inhalation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • Fast Green FCF (Sigma, Cat. No. XXXXF7252-5G)
    Caution May be harmful if swallowed or inhaled. May cause eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation. Avoid contact and inhalation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • Weigert Hematoxylin Solution (Sigma, Cat. No. HT 1079)
    Caution. Known irritant. May cause eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation. Avoid contact and inhalation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • Differentiation solution (Sigma, Cat. No. A3179)
    Caution. Corrosive. Flammable; keep away from fire. Avoid prolonged exposure. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • Permount® (Fisher Scientific, Cat. No. SP15-100)
    Caution. Contains toluene. Causes eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation. Avoid contact and inhalation. Inhalation may cause drowsiness and dizziness. May cause central nervous system depression. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)

Immunohistochemistry

  • Zymed Histostain® Plus Broad Spectrum (Invitrogen, Cat. No. 85-8943)
  • Type II collagen antibody (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Cat. No. II-II6B3 ordered as supernatant)
  • Type I collagen antibody (AbCam, Cat. No. AB6308)
  • Type X collagen antibody (Sigma, Cat. No. C7974)
  • 2-B-6 Chondroitin-4-Sulfate antibody (Seikagaku, Cat. No. 270432)
  • 3-B-3 Chondroitin-6-Sulfate antibody (Seikagaku, Cat. No. 270433)
  • Anti-Mouse IgG (Fab specific)–Biotin secondary antibody produced in goat (Sigma, Cat. No. B7151)
  • Xylene
    Caution. Harmful or fatal if swallowed. Causes severe eye irritation. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • AEC Substrate-Chromagen (Invitrogen, Cat. No. 00-1111)
  • Digest-All 3 (Pepsin) (Invitrogen, Cat. No. 00-3009)
  • Chondroitinase ABC (Sigma, Cat. No. C 2905)
  • PAP Pen (Research Products International, Cat. No. 195505)
  • Methanol (EMD, Cat. No. MX0485-7)
    Caution. Harmful if swallowed. Highly flammable; keep away from heat and ignition sources. Use appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid exposure (i.e., wear gloves, safety glasses and a mask, or use material in fume hood.)
  • Hydrogen Peroxide (EMD, Cat. No. HX0635-2)
  • Goat serum (Invitrogen, Cat. No. 50-062Z)
  • GVA Mounting Medium (Invitrogen, Cat. No. 008000)

qPCR

  • RNASecure Reagent (Applied Biosystems, Cat. No. AM7005)
  • 2 mL microcentrifuge tubes (RNase/DNase free) (VWR, Cat. No. 87003-298) Note: the design of these microcentrifuge tubes (wider bottom) allows more efficient chelation of alginate.
  • Table 2: TaqMan Assays on Demand for assessing chondrogenesis 45
    Table 2

    Table 2
    TaqMan Assays on Demand

Equipment

  • Centrifuge
  • Water bath shaker
  • Microplate reader (for fluorescence and absorbance based assays)
  • Speedvac or lyophilizer
  • Microtome
  • Real-Time PCR Instrument
  • Hot plate with temperature control

REAGENT SETUP

Cell Isolation

Expansion medium: Use all reagents listed in Table 1. Expansion medium may be stored at 4° C in the dark for up to 2 weeks.

Table 3

Table 3
Media components for expanding ASCs

Stromal medium: Use all reagents listed in Table 1, except for rhEGF, rhFGF, and TGF-β1 (i.e., stromal medium should not contain any growth factors). Stromal medium may be stored at 4° C in the dark for up to 6 weeks.

Collagenase solution: This should be made fresh before starting the isolation and filter sterilized using a 250 ml sterilization unit. Make a 1% (v/v) solution of BSA in D-PBS. To this solution, add Type I collagenase to make a 0.1% (w/v) collagenase solution and 1 M calcium chloride to a final concentration of 2 mM.

  • Red cell lysis buffer: Prepare a sterile solution of 155 mM ammonium chloride (NH4Cl), 10 mM potassium carbonate (K2CO3), and 0.1 mM EDTA. Use within two weeks of preparation.
    Freeze medium: Make a solution containing 80% (v/v) FBS, 10% (v/v) DMEM/F12, and 10% (v/v) DMSO.

Cell Differentiation

Incomplete chondrogenic medium. Make up using all reagents listed in Table 2. This medium may be stored at 4° C in the dark for up to 6 weeks.

Table 4

Table 4
Incomplete chondrogenic medium

Complete chondrogenic medium: Thaw growth factors and add freshly to incomplete chondrogenic medium just before use. Three different growth factor combinations have been used successfully to promote ASC chondrogenesis (Table 3).

 

Alginate Culture

Preparation of 1.2% (w/v) alginate solution: Dissolve 1.2 g of alginate in 100 ml of 150 mM NaCl. Heat on a hot plate and stir thoroughly. Filter sterilize using a 0.22 μm filter. Another option is to prepare the solution using aseptic technique in a sterile hood, thus obviating the need for filter sterilization. Store resulting alginate solution (1.2%) at 4°C.

CaCl2 (102 mM) solution: Place 10.2 ml of a 1 M CaCl2 stock solution into 100 mL volumetric flask and then pipette in 89.8 mL dH2O. Filter through 250 ml filter system. Store working solution (102 mM) at 4°C.

NaCl (150 mM) solution: Place 15.0 ml of the 1 M NaCl stock solution into 100 mL volumetric flask and then pipette in 85 mL dH2O. Filter through 250 ml filter system. Store working solution (150 mM) at 4°C.

Sodium Chloride (50 mM) – Sodium Citrate (55 mM) buffer: Dissolve 1.461 g of NaCl into 300 ml of dH20. Dissolve 8.087 g of sodium citrate into this same solution. Add dH20 to a final volume of 500 ml.

Sample fixative for histology/immunohistochemistry

Pipette 10 ml of 16% paraformaldehyde into a 50 ml conical tube. Dissolve 0.856 g of sodium cacodylate. If alginate is being fixed, add 0.104 g BaCl2 to irreversibly cross-link the alginate matrix. Titrate the solution with 1 N HCl to a pH of 7.4. Adjust the final volume of the solution to 40 ml with dH20. Caution: paraformaldehyde and sodium cacodylate are considered carcinogenic. Only handle these reagents in a biosafety level 3 cabinet with the sash adjusted to the proper height to provide maximum protection to the user.

DMB Assay

Preparation of 1,9-dimethlemethylene blue (DMB) dye: Dissolve 21 mg of 1,9-dimethtlemethylene blue into 5 ml of absolute ethanol with 2.0 g of sodium formate and stir thoroughly in 800 ml of distilled water. Titrate concentrated formic acid into the dye solution to adjust the pH to the desired level (pH 1.5 for the alginate DMB assay and pH 3.0 for the pellet cultures). Add distilled water to make a final volume of 1000 ml. This solution may be stored for up to 6 months at room temperature (RT, 19 to 25°C). Note that the solution should be protected from light.

Preparation of Stock Chondroitin-4-Sulfate Standard Solution (10 mg/ml): Weigh 100 mg of chondroitin-4-sulfate (C-4-S). Dissolve the powder in 10 ml of D-PBS in a 50 ml conical tube. Vortex to insure thorough mixing. Dilute 1 ml of the Stock C-4-S solution into 9 ml of Papain solution. This produces a 1 mg/ml C-4-S solution. Freeze in 1 ml aliquots and store at −80°C. Thaw an aliquot on the day of the assay to prepare the standard curve for the DMB assay.

Hydroxyproline assay

Acetate-Citrate Buffer pH 6.5Dissolve the 12 g of Sodium acetate trihydrate, 5 g of citric acid monohydrate, 1.2 mL acetic acid, and 3.4 g sodium hydroxide in 750 ml of dH2O. Measure pH and adjust to 6.0 if necessary by titration with 1 N NaOH or acetic acid. Bring the solution to a final volume of 1000 ml with dH2O. Can be prepared and stored for 1 – 2 months at room temperature.

Chloramine-T Reagent (0.062 M), Dissolve 141 mg of chloramine-T in 2.07 ml of dH2O and 2.6 ml n-propanol. Note: mix dH2O and n-propanol first. Add 5.33 ml of the Acetate-Citrate buffer described above. Vortex to dissolve completely. CRITICAL: Must be prepared fresh just before it is to be used.

p-DMBA Reagent (0.94 M), Dissolve 1.4 g of p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde in 7 ml of n-propanol and vortex. Add 3.0 ml of perchloric acid. Vortex to dissolve completely. CRITICAL: Must be prepared fresh just before it is to be used and used within 1 hour.

Hydroxyproline Standard stock (10 mg/ml), Dissolve 100 mg of trans-4 hydroxyproline-L in 10 mL of distilled water to get a stock solution of 10mg/mL. Vortex to dissolve completely. Can be made in advance and stored in 1 ml aliquots at −80°C.

PROCEDURE

ASC Isolation

  • 1. Prepare the water bath shaker at 37 °C, with enough water to cover the bottles containing collagenase mixture.
  • 2. Prepare fresh a solution of 0.1% (w/v) collagenase, 1 % (v/v) bovine serum albumin (fraction V), and 2 mM calcium chloride in PBS. The volume of the collagenase solution should equal the volume of lipoaspirate to be processed (usually 100 to 200 ml).
  • 3. Warm the D-PBS, collagenase solution, and medium to 37 °C.
  • 4. Allow the fat transport container to sit until the fat and blood are well separated. Transfer the fat to a sterile, 250 ml plastic centrifuge tube for separation. Note: cell isolations are routinely performed the day of receipt or performed the next day, after leaving the tissue at room temperature overnight.
    CAUTION: Procedures must be performed in accordance with Institutional Review Board policies for obtaining human tissue including informed consent by personnel certified and trained to work with blood borne pathogens. All procedures involving the human tissue should be performed at Biosafety Level 2 with appropriate personal protection.
  • 5. Using a 25 ml serological pipette, aspirate off the blood layer from beneath the floating fat.
  • 6. Check the tissue volume; it should be approximately 100 ml in each 250 ml centrifuge tube.
    The isolated cells will be plated at an equivalent to ~35 ml of liposuction aspirate digest per T225 flask so plan the amount of tissue needed accordingly. If there is less tissue volume, the flask size should be reduced accordingly to achieve approximately 0.16 ml tissue per square centimeter.
  • 7. Wash the fat with D-PBS (1:1 volume) up to 7 times or until the color of the D-PBS layer is about the hue of the fat – a light pink color. Allow the two phases to separate between washes (3–5 min). Gently stir the solution while it sits; this will encourage separation and aid the washing. Continue to remove the blood layer from beneath the yellow fat tissue. After a few washes, a bright yellow layer of extra cellular fat will begin to form on top of the fat cell layer. Carefully aspirate off this thin layer. Note that 4 washes should be sufficient.
  • 8. After the fat layer has been thoroughly washed, mix it 1:1 (v:v) with the warm D-PBS:collagenase solution. Place it in the 37° C shaker water bath and gently shake for 1 hour. Shake to mix by hand every 20 minutes if using 250 ml centrifuge bottles; or shake to mix by hand every 5–10 minutes if using 50 ml centrifuge tubes.
    Note that if a shaker water bath is not available, 50 ml or 250 ml tubes may be placed on a shaker in a 37° C incubator. TROUBLESHOOTING
  • 9. Centrifuge at 300 g at 21° C for 5 minutes.
  • 10. Shake the tubes vigorously for 10 seconds to ensure that individual cells are released from the strands of fibrous tissue.
  • 11. Centrifuge at 300 g at 21° C for 5 minutes.
  • 12. Aspirate off the floating mature adipocyte layer and the aqueous collagenase/D-PBS supernatants, leaving 5 ml of D-PBS on each pellet of cells. Be careful with the cell pellet as it is gelatinous and does not adhere readily to the centrifuge tubes. TROUBLESHOOTING
  • 13. Resuspend each cell pellet in 10 ml stromal medium and pool the suspensions into sterile, 50 ml centrifuge tubes.
  • 14. Centrifuge at 300 g at 21° C for 5 minutes.
  • 15. Aspirate off the supernatants, leaving 5 ml of stromal medium on each pellet.
  • 16. Resuspend cell pellets in 10 ml stromal medium and pool contents into a sterile, 50 ml centrifuge tubes.
  • 17. Centrifuge at 300 g at 21° C for 5 minutes.
  • 18. Aspirate off the supernatants, leaving 5 ml of stromal medium on each pellet.
    Note that the pellet can look very different from patient to patient at this stage.
  • 19. Resuspend in a total of 105 ml stromal media per 100 ml of lipoaspirate digest.
    TROUBLESHOOTING

ASC Expansion

  • 20. Plate each dish at an equivalent density to 0.16 ml of liposuction aspirate per cm2 or ~35 ml per 225cm2 flask.
  • 21. Thoroughly clean up by collecting all contaminated materials into biohazard bags.
  • 22. Clean the hood with 10% detergent, then 10% bleach, then 70% ethanol.
  • 23. After 24 hours, change the media on the cells to wash away any non-adherent cells.
  • 24. Feed the cells every three days for up to 7 days by replacing 100% of the media in each flask.
    TROUBLESHOOTING
  • 25. Harvest cells when they are 80% confluent by trypsinization. Aspirate off expansion medium. Wash the flasks gently with 20 ml of D-PBS warmed to 37° C. Add 8 ml of trypsin/T225 flask, and incubate for 5 minutes at 37 ° C. Verify that the cells have been dislodged from the cell culture plate using a microscope. Inactivate trypsin with an equal amount of stromal medium (i.e., 8 ml).
  • 26. Collect the 16 ml of trypsin/stromal medium in a 50 ml conical tube.
  • 27. Centrifuge at 300 g at 21° C for 5 minutes to pellet cells. Aspirate medium on top of cells.
  • 28. Either passage ASCs further (option A), freeze cells (option B), proceed with chondrogenic differentiation in pellet culture (option C) or proceed with chondrogenic differentiation in alginate beads (option D).

Option A. Further passage. TROUBLESHOOTING

  1. Resuspend ASCs in expansion medium and replate at 8,000 cells/cm2. Representative images of ASCs through 1 passage can be seen in Figure 2. CRITICAL cells may be used up to passage 4, after which the cells will start to lose their differentiation potential.
    Figure 2

    Figure 2
    Expansion of ASCs in expansion medium over 5 days. Appearance of cells at 10x after (a) 30 minutes, (b) 3 hours, (c) 1 day, (d) 2 days, (e) 3 days, (f) 4 days, and (g) 5 days. Black arrows in (h) and (i) show cells with atypical or abnormal morphology. 
  2. Ii)Trypisinize cells at ~80% confluence (Figure 2g).

Option B. Freeze cells.

  1. Make aliquots of 1–5 million cells/ml in freeze medium in cryovials.
  2. Freeze cells in freeze medium at a rate of −1° C/min using a 1°C freezing container until they reach −80° C, after which the cells may be stored long-term in liquid nitrogen.
    PAUSEPOINT Cells can be stored long-term in liquid nitrogen. When thawing cells, place vial in 37° C water bath to thaw cells rapidly. Immediately upon thawing, remove cells from vial and wash cells in 2–3 ml of stromal medium. Centrifuge at 300 g at 21 °C for 5 minutes after which the cells can be resuspended and plated at 8,000 cells/cm2.

Option C. Chondrogenic differentiation in pellet culture:

  1. Following trypsinization of the cells, split desired number of cells (250,000 per pellet) to 15 ml tubes designated for either negative control or chondrogenic conditions.
  2. Resuspend cells in either Incomplete (control) or Complete Chondrogenic Medium at a density of 500,000 cells/mL. Incomplete chondrogenic medium can be used as a negative control. Complete chondrogenic medium with ASCs known to be capable of chondrogenesis may be used as a positive control.
  3. Pipette 0.5 ml of cell suspension into 15 mL polypropylene conical tubes. This yields 250,000 ASCs per tube.
  4. Centrifuge at 300 g at 21 °C for 5 minutes to form a pellet at the bottom of the tube.
    Loosen the tops of the conical tubes for gas exchange. Incubate cultures at 37°C and 5% CO2overnight.
    The following day, the pellets should be rounded in the bottom of the tube.
  5. Every other day, for the duration of the experiment, prepare complete chondrogenic medium by adding growth factors and L-Ascorbic acid 2-phosphate and exchange medium. Typical durations for culture are 2, 4, and 6 weeks.
  6. At each medium exchange, agitate tube gently to ensure the pellet has not adhered to the wall of the tubes.
  7. To harvest, remove the chondrogenic medium and wash the pellets once with D-PBS. Fix the pellet in the paraformaldehyde solution for immunohistochemistry and histology, or digest the pellet in a papain solution for biochemical analysis (see step 29).

Option D. Chondrogenic differentiation in alginate beads:

  1. Warm alginate and CaCl2 to 37 °C prior to encapsulation of ASCs.
  2. Resuspend ASCs in 1.2% alginate solution at 5×106 cells/ml in a 50 ml conical tube. Mix thoroughly by pipetting without creating bubbles, or mix with the use of micro stir bars using a magnetic stirring plate. Note that if the latter technique is used for mixing, a volume of greater than 700 μl is required to avoid making bubbles.
  3. Using a 1 ml pipette, draw 1 ml of solution into tip.
  4. Dispense by tilting the pipette sideways and slowly pipetting cell suspension such that one drop falls from the pipette tip into 1 ml of pre-warmed CaCl2. Typically, 3 drops of alginate are added to each well of a low attachment surface 24 well plate. (Figure 3 shows a 2.5x image of ASCs encapsulated within alginate.) Note that alginate bead diameter will vary from ~4 – 5mm and will contain approximately 275,000 cells. Five to six wells can be filled per ml of alginate.
    Figure 3

    Figure 3
    2.5x microscope image (2.5x) of ASCs encapsulated in alginate. Scale bar = 1 mm.
  5. Incubate the alginate beads at 37°C for 5 minutes to allow Ca+2 cations to fully diffuse through the alginate and cross-link the alginate cell suspension.
  6. Pipette off the CaCl2 solution. Note that aspiration can be used, but care must be taken to avoid suction pressure on the alginate beads.
  7. Wash the beads with 1.5 ml incomplete chondrogenic medium at 37°C for 15 minutes. Pipette off incomplete medium and repeat for an additional 15 minutes at 37°C.
  8. Replace incomplete medium with complete chondrogenic medium, 1 ml/well of a 24 well plate. Note that typically 1 ml of medium is used for every 800,000 to 1,000,000 cells. Incomplete chondrogenic medium can be used as a negative control. Complete chondrogenic medium with ASCs known to be capable of chondrogenesis may be used as a positive control.
  9. Incubate at 37°C, 5.0% CO2. According to experimental design, take samples at day 0 and subsequent time points to be prepared for biochemical examination, histological and immunohistological examination, or gene expression analysis. Accordingly, proceed to the applicable section of this protocol. Refer to Figure 1 for timing for procedures. Every other day for the duration of the experiment, prepare complete chondrogenic medium by adding growth factors and L-Ascorbic acid 2-phosphate and exchange medium. Typical durations for culture are 2, 4, and 6 weeks.

Biochemical determination methods

  • 29
    There are a number of options as to how to process the cells further. See Table 1 for information about what each assay assesses. If you wish to perform the dimethyl-methylene blue (DMB) assay34, 35, follow option A. If you wish to do the hydroxyproline assay35, 64, 65, follow option B. If you wish to perform histology or immunohistochemistry proceed with option C for all samples followed by option D for safranin-o/fast green staining, option E for toluidine blue staining or option F for immunohistochemistry. If you wish to do RT-PCR follow option G.

 

Option A) Dimethylmethylene blue (DMB) Assay

  1. Harvest samples at appropriate time points and digest in 1 ml of papain solution (for alginate beads, 3 beads/well = 1 construct) for 15–18 hours at 65°C. CRITICAL: If wet weight is desired for normalization, weigh the samples before digestion in papain.
    PAUSEPOINT If desired, digested samples can be stored at −20°C and then thawed for analysis.
  2. Determine total DNA per construct using the PicoGreen dsDNA quantitation kit per the instructions from the manufacturer. Total dsDNA will be used to normalize DMB content.
  3. Prepare the diluted standard solutions of C-4-S (from 0 to 35 μg/ml) mixing the quantities shown in Table 4 (in microliters) of the 1 mg/ml C-4-S solution with the Papain:
    Table 6

    Table 6
    Volumes for chondroitin 4-sulfate (C-4-S) standard curve
  4. In a clear, flat-bottom 96-well plate, aliquot 40μl of the C-4-S standard solutions and samples to wells. Note that it is likely that some or all samples will need to be diluted with papain at this stage in order for the samples to fall in the range of the standard curve.
  5. Add 125 μl of the DMB dye (pH 3.0 for samples not containing alginate) to each well of the plate using a multichannel pipette.
  6. Measure the optical density of the solutions (standard and experimental) using the 595 nm filter (OD595) on a plate reader. Follow option B step
  7. Xxiii onward to calculate S-GAG content.

Option B) Hydroxyproline (OHP) Assay

  1. Harvest samples at appropriate time points and digest in 1 ml of papain solution (for alginate beads, 3 beads/well = 1 construct) for 15–18 hours at 65°C. CRITICAL: If wet weight is desired for normalization, weigh the samples before digestion in papain.
    PAUSEPOINT If desired, digested samples can be stored at −20°C and then thawed for analysis.
  2. Determine total DNA per construct using the PicoGreen dsDNA quantitation kit per the instructions from the manufacturer. Total dsDNA will be used to normalize hydroxyproline content.
  3. Using pre labeled test tubes, make up your standard solutions by mixing the following proportions of the 1 mg/ml working hydroxyproline solution with D-PBS as follows:
  4. Aliquot 50 μl of the standard solutions and samples in prelabeled microcentrifuge tubes. Note that any dilutions that need to be carried out to bring samples within the range of the standard curve should be performed at this step using papain.
  5. Add 50 μl of the 12 N HCl (37%). (Final Concentration ~6N)
    CRITICAL: ensure caps close cleanly without deformation of plastic. Any deformation will result in evaporation of liquid before samples are hydrolyzed.
  6. Hydrolyze the samples by incubating in an oven at 110°C for 15–18 hours (overnight).
    TROUBLESHOOTING
  7. Retrieve the tubes from oven.
  8. Spin for 10 or 15 seconds in a microcentrifuge to collect any condensate on the sides and cap of the tubes.
  9. Dry the samples completely either by lyophilization or by a Speedvac. Note that this could take several hours depending on the drying method used. Alternatively, one can remove the caps and place the samples in a laminar flow hood for 2–3 days to dry the samples.
  10. Reconstitute the dried samples and standard in 100 μl of the Acetate-Citrate buffer. Mix thoroughly and vortex to dissolve completely.
  11. Add enough activated charcoal to cover the filter chamber of the Spin-X HPLC column. Note that a 1 ml filter tip pipette works well for this purpose.
  12. Place the reconstituted samples and standards in the filter chamber of the Spin-X HPLC microcentrifuge tubes. CRITICAL: Do not discard the tubes as they will be used again in step Xiv
  13. Spin the samples for 3 minutes at 12,900 g in a microcentrifuge to filter the samples thorough the activated charcoal.
  14. Add another 100 μl of the Acetate-Citrate buffer to the original tubes (now empty) to collect and reconstitute any residual amounts of the sample. Mix and vortex as before.
  15. Place the reconstituted “residual” samples and standards in the filter chamber of the Spin-X HPLC microcentrifuge tubes.
  16. Spin again for 3 minutes at 12,900 g in a microcentrifuge to filter the samples thorough the activated charcoal.
  17. Aliquot triplicates of 50 μl of the samples and standards in individual wells of a 96 well plate.
  18. Add 50 μl of Chloramine-T (0.062 M, prepared fresh as previously described) to the wells. Mix gently on an orbital shaker. Allow the oxidation to proceed for 15 minutes at room temperature.
  19. For chromophore development, add 50 μl of the p-DMBA reagent to each sample.
  20. Mix gently on an orbital shaker.
  21. Allow the reddish/purple color development by incubating the samples at 37°C for 30 minutes.
  22. Measure the optical density (OD) at 550 (or 540) nm on a plate reader.
  23. Calculation of the amount of S-GAG or OH-proline: First calculate the average values of the duplicates or triplicates of each of the standard and experimental samples. Use these averages in the following calculations.
  24. Calculate the “corrected” values of standard optical densities (OD) by taking the difference between the OD for the 0 μg/ml standard and that of the measured standard. Note that because DMB has a decreasing absorbance with increasing GAG concentration while OHP has increasing absorbance with increasing proline concentration, the terms in the following equations are switched to achieve positive values.
    equation M1
  25. Calculate the “corrected” values of experimental samples optical densities (OD) by taking the difference between the OD for the 0 μg/ml standard and that of the measured samples
    equation M2
  26. Plot the corrected optical density (x-axis) of each of the standard solutions versus the concentration (y-axis) of each of the standard solutions. Use linear regression (forcing a fit through the origin) to obtain the equation describing the linear relationship between the optical density and the concentration.
  27. Using linear regression, calculate the concentration of sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)/OH-proline in the experimental samples based on the corrected ODSample values. Multiply the calculated concentration by the original sample volume and any dilution factors that were used.
  28. For the OH-proline assay, determine the collagen concentration by using the conversion factor of 7.46 mg collagen to 1 mg 4-hydroxyproline. Note that a conversion factor of 10 mg collagen to 1 mg 4-hydroxyproline may be used instead of 7.46 to account for the presence of mostly type II collagen in constructs 66.
  29. Normalize the results to wet weight of constructs and/or total DNA of constructs. If samples are out of the standard range, dilute the samples appropriately and repeat the measurement, or prepare another standard spanning a wider range.

Option C) Histologic and immunohistochemical methods

  1. Immediately following the culture period, place each construct (3 beads = 1 construct for alginate beads) in 20 ml of the paraformaldehyde solution. Fix for 4 hours at RT or overnight at 4°C.
  2. Dehydrate constructs with 30% (v/v) EtOH (diluted in diH2O) for 30 min, 50% EtOH for 30 min and70% EtOH for 30 min PAUSEPOINT Can be stored long term in 70% ethanol if not continuing immediately.
  3. Dehydrate constructs with 80% EtOH for 30 min, 100% EtOH for 30 min, followed by one additional 100% EtOH wash. PAUSEPOINT. Can be stored overnight in 100% EtOH.
  4. Clear constructs by removing 50% of solution and replacing with xylene yielding a final concentration of 50% EtOH/50% xylene. Incubate 30 min at RT. Replace this 1:1 mixture with 100% xylene and incubate 30 min at RT. Exchange 100% xylene and incubate for an additional 30 min at RT. CRITICAL: ensure that constructs are translucent. If not clear, continue processing with xylene washes until constructs become clear to translucent.
  5. Embed the constructs in paraffin by removing half of the xylene and replacing it with paraffin such that the final concentration is 50% xylene/50% paraffin. Incubate at 60° C for 1 hr. Replace 1:1 mixture with 100% paraffin and incubate at 60° C for 1 hr; replace paraffin again with 100% paraffin and incubate again at 60° C for 1 hr.
    CRITICAL: work quickly with the paraffin to ensure that the paraffin does not have time to solidify. If the paraffin solidifies, incubation times must increase to properly infiltrate the construct with paraffin.
  6. Place in embedding tray in desired orientation (attempt to get all 3 alginate beads on the same plane for subsequent sectioning) and allow to harden overnight.
  7. Cut sections 6–10 μm in thickness with a microtome and place in a 45–50° C waterbath.
  8. Place sections on SuperfrostR/Plus Microscope Slides by using slides to remove from waterbath. Allow slides to dry overnight in a 37° C slide warmer. CRITICAL We advise using these particular slides as they have been surface treated for improved adherance of tissue section to slide during processing.

Option D) Safranin-O/fast green

  1. Deparaffinize sections in xylene 3 times for 3 minutes each. (Note that for safranin-o/fast green staining, bone, muscles (collagen) are stained green, and cartilage is stained orange or red.)
  2. Re-hydrate in 100% EtOH 2 × 5 minutes, 95% EtOH 1 × 2 minutes, and 70% EtOH 1 × 2 minutes.
  3. Wash in tap water for 30 sec.
  4. Stain in Weigert hematoxylin solution for 8 minutes.
  5. Wash in tap water for 3 minutes by repeatedly dipping slides.
  6. Differentiate in Differentiation Solution for 30 seconds.
  7. Wash in tap water for 10 minutes by repeatedly dipping slides (until sections turn a blue hue)
  8. Stain in 0.02 % (w/v) aqueous fast green for 3 minutes.
  9. Rinse for approximately 10 seconds in 1% acetic acid.
  10. Dip the slides in tap water briefly and then remove excess water from the slide.
  11. Stain in 0.1 % (v/v) aqueous safranin-O for up to 5 minutes maximum.
  12. Rinse in 100 % EtOH to remove extra red staining on the slide.
  13. Dehydrate in 95% EtOH 2 × 5 minutes, followed by 100% alcohol 2 × 5 minutes.
  14. Clear in xylene 3 × 2 minutes.
  15. Mount with Permount.

Option E: Toluidine Blue

  1. Re-hydrate in 100% EtOH 2 × 5 minutes, 95% EtOH 1 × 2 minutes, and 70% EtOH 1 × 2 minutes.
  2. Wash in tap water for 30 sec.
  3. Stain in 0.25 % (w/v in distilled water) aqueous toluidine blue for 5 minutes.
  4. Rinse with distilled water until excess stain is washed away.
  5. Dehydrate in 95% EtOH 2 × 5 minutes, followed by 100% alcohol 2 × 5 minutes.
  6. Clear in xylene 3 × 2 minutes.
  7. Mount with Permount.

Option F) Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

  1. Deparaffinize by washing slides 3 times × 2 minutes/wash in xylene.
  2. Dip slides in 100% EtOH for 2 washes of 2 minutes each
  3. After slide dries, circle section with PAP pen
  4. Rehydrate slides: 95% EtOH for 2 washes of 2 minutes each; 80% EtOH for 1 wash of 2 minutes; 50% EtOH for 1 wash of 2 minutes; D-PBS for 1 wash of 5 minutes
  5. Quench endogenous peroxidase activity by submerging slides in 1 part 30% H2O2: 9 parts methanol for 10 minutes.
  6. Wash slides in D-PBS: 3 washes of 2 minutes each
  7. For antigen retrieval, add sufficient Digest-All to completely cover each tissue section
  8. Incubate at RT for 5 minutes
  9. Wash slides in D-PBS: 3 washes of 2 minutes each. (If not labeling for chondroitin sulfate, skip to stepXii)
  10. If using antibodies for labeling chondroitin sulfate epitopes, apply chondroitinase ABC to each section and incubate at RT for 20 minutes.
  11. Wash slides in D-PBS: 3 washes of 2 minutes each.
  12. Block sections with Serum Blocking agent (Reagent A in kit)
  13. Add enough reagent to completely cover tissue section (2–3 drops) TROUBLESHOOTING
  14. Incubate at RT for 30 minutes (ensure sections do not dry)
  15. Blot excess serum from bottom of inclined slide (do not rinse)
  16. Dilute primary antibody in non-immune serum, Reagent A, or 10% goat serum (Col I, Col X – 1:400, C-4-S and C-6-S – 1:200, and Col 2 – 1:1).
  17. Add antibody onto (+) staining sections, and blocking serum onto (−) control sections.
  18. Incubate at room temperature for 1 hour or overnight at 4°C in large plastic petri dish lined with wet filter paper to keep slides moist.
  19. Wash slides in D-PBS: 3 washes of 2 minutes each,
  20. Apply secondary antibody (Reagent B in kit) to cover tissue sections (2 drops).
  21. Incubate at RT for 10 minutes
  22. Wash slides in D-PBS: 3 washes of 2 minutes each
  23. Apply enough Enzyme Conjugate (Reagent C in kit) to cover tissue sections (2 drops)
  24. Incubate at RT for 10 minutes
  25. Wash slides in D-PBS: 3 washes of 2 minutes each
  26. Add enough Substrate-Chromagen (AEC) mixture to cover tissue (2 drops)
  27. Incubate at RT for 20 minutes
  28. Gently dip sections in distilled H2O (leave wet)
  29. If desired, add 1 2 drops Hematoxylin to counterstain nuclei. If slides are not counterstained, skip to step XXXiii.
  30. Incubate at RT for 5 minutes
  31. Wash with tap H2O
  32. Wash slides in D-PBS for 30s or until slides turn a blue hue.
  33. Wash slides in dH2O: 3 washes for 2 minutes each (let slides remain in H2O until coverslips are placed)
  34. Mount slides by applying GVA Mounting Medium to 1 slide at a time and place coverslips.
    CRITICAL: do not allow slides to dry before placing mounting medium.

 

Option G) Real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) methods

  1. For gene expression analysis, first isolate the ASCs from the alginate matrix. Note that gene expression analysis can also be performed on pellets, but the RNA yield is much lower than using alginate beads. For experiments requiring gene expression for pellets, we suggest pooling 5–10 pellets and pulverizing the samples with a mortar and pestle cooled with liquid nitrogen before proceeding with the RNA isolation kit.
  2. Add RNAsecure reagent to the sodium chloride, sodium citrate buffer (final concentration, 1X) and distribute to 2 ml microcentrifuge tubes for each construct (3 beads) plus one for temperature control.
  3. Heat solution to 60° C for 10 minutes on a hot plate to activate the RNAsecure enzymes.
  4. Cool the solution to 41° C, and add 1 construct (3 beads) to each tube.
  5. Agitate tubes every 10 minutes until alginate is in solution. This should take ~ 1 hour. CRITICAL: maintain the solution at 41° C during this entire process to maintain enzyme activity.
  6. Once alginate is no longer visible, centrifuge microcentrifuge tubes at 300 g for 5 minutes at 21° C to pellet cells.
  7. Wash the cells with 500 ml of D-PBS with 1x RNAsecure and centrifuge again for 5 minutes at 21° C to pellet cells.
  8. Aspirate D-PBS.
  9. Either immediately process the cells with the RNA isolation kit or snap freeze in liquid nitrogen and store at −80° C for future processing. PAUSEPOINT Can be stored at −80° C for up to 1 month prior to further processing, though the user is cautioned that the samples should be processed as soon as possible to avoid any potential RNA degradation issues. 29. Assess gene expression by following the procedures of Nolan and Bustin 67.

TIMING

Steps 1–19 ASC Isolation (3–5 hours for isolation)

Steps 20–28A ASC Expansion (2–5 weeks for expansion)

Step 28B Freeze Cells (2 Hours)

Step 28C ASC Pellet Culture (2 hours to prepare pellets)

Step 28D ASC Alginate Culture (4 hours to embed ASCs in alginate)

Steps 29A–B Biochemical determination methods (1 hour at appropriate time points to harvest samples and prepare for overnight papain digestion (Step 29). At a later time, dsDNA (Step 30, 2 hours), DMB (Option A, 1 hour), and OHP (Option B, ~10 hours over 2 days)

Steps 29C–F Histologic and immunohistochemical methods (Option C, 1 hour to fix samples overnight, 1 day to embed samples, 15 min/sample for sectioning, several days for staining). Safranin-O/Fast Green (Option D, 1.5 hours), Toluidine Blue (Option E, 1 hour), Immunohistochemistry (Option F, 24 hours).

Step 29G Real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) methods (2–3 hours at appropriate timepoints to isolate cells and 2 days for subsequent RNA isolation and qPCR at a later time).

ANTICIPATED RESULTS TROUBLESHOOTING

ASCs can be expanded rapidly in monolayer culture (Figure 2). Following expansion, ASCs can be differentiated in pellet or alginate culture accordingly, using the induction cocktails listed in Table 3. We have previously defined successful chondrogenesis using histologic and biochemical markers. For pellet culture, one can anticipate successful chondrogenesis as having sulfated glycosaminoglycan content greater than ≥ 931.7 ± 222.3 ng/pellet and having collagen II present in ≥ 29.0 ± 2.2% of the area stained per field of view 37. This metric was based on histogram-derived thresholds set at values exceeding the 90th percentile of controls for each assay 37. Similar metrics can also be applied to hydrogel based scaffold systems (e.g., alginate) to discern the degree and success of chondrogenesis; though the reader is reminded that due to the negative charge of the alginate matrix, neither safranin-o nor toluidine blue may be used. Therefore, when using alginate, the user of this protocol must rely on immunohistochemistry to discern the spatial organization of the cartilaginous matrix 45, 51, 56, 57. Figure 4 demonstrates the variability observed in the accumulation of a sulfated glycosaminoglycan matrix in pellet culture using toluidine blue showing a positive result in 4b; whereas 4c is indicative of a poor or negative result for chondrogenesis. Similarly, under appropriate conditions, ASCs embedded in alginate synthesize collagens and proteoglycan (Figure 5); though negative markers of chondrogenesis (e.g., collagen I and excessive collagen X) should also be monitored. Typically, cartilage-specific matrix molecules are seen most intensely in the pericellular matrix with diffuse staining throughout the tissue-engineered construct. During chondrogenic differentiation, it is also typical to observe a significant size increase in the pellet. This pellet size difference is observed as early as 14 days in culture and persists throughout the duration of the experiment (Figure 6).

Figure 4

Figure 4
Toluidine Blue stain on (a) human articular cartilage and (b) and (c) are representative images of typical variation in GAG synthesis and accumulation obtained from ASC pellets cultured for 14 days. (Note. Expect similar results if Safranin-O stain were 
Figure 5

Figure 5
Representative immunohistochemistry results for chondroitin-4-sulfate and types I, II, and X collagen for a typical experiment with ASCs encapsulated in alginate after 4 weeks in in vitro culture. Positive Control: porcine cartilage for C-4-S, Collagen 
Figure 6

Figure 6
Pellet size after 6 weeks of culture. (a) representative image of pellets in 15 ml conical tubes in incomplete chondrogenic medium + 10% FBS on the left and complete chondrogenic medium containing TGF-b on the right and (b) the left two pellets were cultured 
  • In terms of biochemical content, typical standard curves for both the DMB and OH-proline assay are seen in Figure 7. In general, we measure S-GAG and OH-proline content in the 4 – 10 μg/μg of dsDNA as we have previously demonstrated 34, 35. Our qPCR analyses have typically been used to ascertain early chondrogenic events. For example, after 7 days in culture, the addition of 500 ng/ml BMP-6 up-regulated the expression of principal cartilage ECM components, aggrecan (AGC1) and type II collagen (COL2A1) by an average of 205-fold and 38-fold, respectively over day-0 controls, while down-regulating the expression of type X collagen (COL10A1) expression by approximately 2-fold 45; though it should be noted that qPCR data must be evaluated in concert with the other assays detailed in this protocol to determine chondrogenic efficiency. This is also true, in general, as the achievement of a specific value or threshold, in terms of biochemical content or fold-difference over control through qPCR analyses, does not necessarily indicate successful chondrogenesis. The degree and success of chondrogenic differentiation must ultimately be assessed by the investigator when viewed in terms of the hypothesis, objectives, the chondrogenic culture system, and the sum total of all assays employed to assess chondrogenesis.
    Figure 7

    Figure 7
    Typical DMB (A) and OH-Proline (B) assay standard curves. n=3 wells per concentration. Data are mean values ± SEM.

 

Troubleshooting

See Troubleshooting guidance in table 6.

Table 8

Table 8
Troubleshooting table.
Table 7

Table 7
Hydroxyproline standards

Acknowledgments

The development of the protocols presented herein would not have been possible without the many contributions of Hani Awad, Geoffrey Erickson, Beverley Fermor, Yuan-Di Halvorsen, Kristen Lott, Henry Rice, Robert Storms, David Wang, Quinn Wickham, and Art Wu. This work was supported in part by an NSF Graduate Fellowship (BOD), the Coulter Foundation, the Duke Translational Research Institute, and NIH grants AR50245, AG15768, AR48182, AR48852.

Footnotes

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

BTE, BOD, JMG, and FG were involved in the development, testing, and troubleshooting of these protocols, as well as the writing of this manuscript. All authors contributed extensively to this work.

Competing interests statement:

The authors (BTE, JMG, and FG) have filed patent applications on some of the material contained in this article.

References

1. Hootman JM, Brault MW, Helmick CG, Theis KA, Armour BS. Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults United States, 2005. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2009;58:421–426. [PubMed]
2. Praemer A, Furner S, Rice DP. Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; Rosemont, IL: 1999.
3. Goldring MB. Update on the biology of the chondrocyte and new approaches to treating cartilage diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006;20:1003–25. [PubMed]
4. Jackson DW, Simon TM, Aberman HM. Symptomatic articular cartilage degeneration: the impact in the new millennium. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001:S14–25. [PubMed]
5. Rotter N, Haisch A, Bucheler M. Cartilage and bone tissue engineering for reconstructive head and neck surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;262:539–45. [PubMed]
6. Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science. 1993;260:920–6. [PubMed]
7. Aichroth PM, Patel DV, Moyes ST. A prospective review of arthroscopic debridement for degenerative joint disease of the knee. Int Orthop. 1991;15:351–5. [PubMed]
8. Aubin PP, Cheah HK, Davis AM, Gross AE. Long-term followup of fresh femoral osteochondral allografts for posttraumatic knee defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001:S318–27. [PubMed]
9. Baumgaertner MR, Cannon WD, Jr, Vittori JM, Schmidt ES, Maurer RC. Arthroscopic debridement of the arthritic knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990:197–202. [PubMed]
10. Denoncourt PM, Patel D, Dimakopoulos P. Arthroscopy update #1. Treatment of osteochondrosis dissecans of the knee by arthroscopic curettage, follow-up study. Orthop Rev. 1986;15:652–7. [PubMed]
11. Emmerson BC, et al. Fresh osteochondral allografting in the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the femoral condyle. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:907–14. [PubMed]
12. Friedman MJ, Berasi CC, Fox JM. Preliminary results with abrasion arthroplasty in the osteoarthritic knee. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research NO. 1984;182:200–205.
13. Ghazavi MT, Pritzker KP, Davis AM, Gross AE. Fresh osteochondral allografts for post-traumatic osteochondral defects of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:1008–13. [PubMed]
14. Johnson LL. Arthroscopic abrasion arthroplasty: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001:S306–17.[PubMed]
15. Kish G, Modis L, Hangody L. Osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of focal chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee and talus in the athlete. Rationale, indications, techniques, and results.Clin Sports Med. 1999;18:45–66. vi. [PubMed]
16. Steadman JR, et al. Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: average 11-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:477–84. [PubMed]
17. Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Rodrigo JJ. Microfracture: surgical technique and rehabilitation to treat chondral defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001:S362–9. [PubMed]
18. Nehrer S, Spector M, Minas T. Histologic analysis of tissue after failed cartilage repair procedures.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999:149–62. [PubMed]
19. Shapiro F, Koide S, Glimcher MJ. Cell origin and differentiation in the repair of full-thickness defects of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:532–53. [PubMed]
20. Tew SR, Kwan AP, Hann A, Thomson BM, Archer CW. The reactions of articular cartilage to experimental wounding: role of apoptosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:215–25. [PubMed]
21. Breinan HA, et al. Effect of cultured autologous chondrocytes on repair of chondral defects in a canine model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1439–51. [PubMed]
22. Brittberg M, et al. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:889–95. [PubMed]
23. Knutsen G, et al. Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture in the knee. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:455–64. [PubMed]
24. Lee CR, Grodzinsky AJ, Hsu HP, Martin SD, Spector M. Effects of harvest and selected cartilage repair procedures on the physical and biochemical properties of articular cartilage in the canine knee.Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2000;18:790–799. [PubMed]
25. Thirion S, Berenbaum F. Culture and phenotyping of chondrocytes in primary culture. Methods Mol Med. 2004;100:1–14. [PubMed]
26. Stokes DG, et al. Assessment of the gene expression profile of differentiated and dedifferentiated human fetal chondrocytes by microarray analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:404–19. [PubMed]
27. Ohara K, Nakamura K, Ohta E. Chest wall deformities and thoracic scoliosis after costal cartilage graft harvesting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:1030–6. [PubMed]
28. Chang SC, Tobias G, Roy AK, Vacanti CA, Bonassar LJ. Tissue engineering of autologous cartilage for craniofacial reconstruction by injection molding. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:793–9. discussion 800-1. [PubMed]
29. Caplan AI, Bruder SP. Mesenchymal stem cells: building blocks for molecular medicine in the 21st century. Trends Mol Med. 2001;7:259–64. [PubMed]
30. Owen M, Friedenstein AJ. Stromal stem cells: marrow-derived osteogenic precursors. Ciba Found Symp. 1988;136:42–60. [PubMed]
31. Pittenger MF, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science.1999;284:143–7. [PubMed]
32. Aust L, et al. Yield of human adipose-derived adult stem cells from liposuction aspirates.Cytotherapy. 2004;6:7–14. [PubMed]
33. Gimble JM, Guilak F. Differentiation potential of adipose derived adult stem (ADAS) cells. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2003;58:137–60. [PubMed]
34. Awad HA, Halvorsen YD, Gimble JM, Guilak F. Effects of transforming growth factor beta1 and dexamethasone on the growth and chondrogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stromal cells. Tissue Eng. 2003;9:1301–12. [PubMed]
35. Awad HA, Wickham MQ, Leddy HA, Gimble JM, Guilak F. Chondrogenic differentiation of adipose-derived adult stem cells in agarose, alginate, and gelatin scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2004;25:3211–22.[PubMed]
36. Erickson GR, et al. Chondrogenic potential of adipose tissue-derived stromal cells in vitro and in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;290:763–9. [PubMed]
37. Guilak F, et al. Clonal analysis of the differentiation potential of human adipose-derived adult stem cells. J Cell Physiol. 2006;206:229–37. [PubMed]
38. Halvorsen YC, Wilkison WO, Gimble JM. Adipose-derived stromal cells–their utility and potential in bone formation. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24 (Suppl 4):S41–4. [PubMed]
39. Huang CY, Reuben PM, D’Ippolito G, Schiller PC, Cheung HS. Chondrogenesis of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in agarose culture. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol.2004;278:428–36. [PubMed]
40. Safford KM, et al. Neurogenic differentiation of murine and human adipose-derived stromal cells.Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;294:371–9. [PubMed]
41. Wickham MQ, Erickson GR, Gimble JM, Vail TP, Guilak F. Multipotent stromal cells derived from the infrapatellar fat pad of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003:196–212. [PubMed]
42. Zuk PA, et al. Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells. Mol Biol Cell.2002;13:4279–95. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Zuk PA, et al. Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies.Tissue Eng. 2001;7:211–28. [PubMed]
44. Wang DW, Fermor B, Gimble JM, Awad HA, Guilak F. Influence of oxygen on the proliferation and metabolism of adipose derived adult stem cells. J Cell Physiol. 2005;204:184–91. [PubMed]
45. Estes BT, Wu AW, Guilak F. Potent induction of chondrocytic differentiation of human adipose-derived adult stem cells by bone morphogenetic protein 6. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1222–32.[PubMed]
46. Oedayrajsingh-Varma MJ, et al. Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell yield and growth characteristics are affected by the tissue-harvesting procedure. Cytotherapy. 2006;8:166–77. [PubMed]
47. Estes BT, Diekman BO, Guilak F. Monolayer cell expansion conditions affect the chondrogenic potential of adipose-derived stem cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008;99:986–95. [PubMed]
48. Hennig T, et al. Reduced chondrogenic potential of adipose tissue derived stromal cells correlates with an altered TGFbeta receptor and BMP profile and is overcome by BMP-6. J Cell Physiol.2007;211:682–91. [PubMed]
49. Johnstone B, Hering TM, Caplan AI, Goldberg VM, Yoo JU. In vitro chondrogenesis of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells. Exp Cell Res. 1998;238:265–72. [PubMed]
50. Cheng NC, Estes BT, Awad HA, Guilak F. Chondrogenic Differentiation of Adipose-Derived Adult Stem Cells by a Porous Scaffold Derived from Native Articular Cartilage Extracellular Matrix. Tissue Engineering Part A. 2009;15:231–241. [PubMed]
51. Diekman BO, Rowland CR, Caplan AI, Lennon D, Guilak F. Chondrogenesis of adult stem cells from adipose tissue and bone marrow: Induction by growth factors and cartilage derived matrix. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009 doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2009.0398. [Cross Ref]
52. Guilak F, Hung CT. In: Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics and Mechano-Biology. Mow VC, Huiskes R, editors. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia: 2004.
53. Mow VC, Guo XE. Mechano-electrochemical properties of articular cartilage: their inhomogeneities and anisotropies. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2002;4:175–209. [PubMed]
54. Mow VC, Proctor CS, Kelly MA. In: Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System. Nordin M, Frankel VH, editors. Lea & Febiger; Philadelphia, London: 1989. pp. 31–58.
55. Heinegård D, Oldberg A. Structure and biology of cartilage and bone matrix noncollagenous macromolecules. FASEB Journal. 1989;3:2042–51. [PubMed]
56. Diekman BO, Estes BT, Guilak F. The effects of BMP6 overexpression on adipose stem cell chondrogenesis: Interactions with dexamethasone and exogenous growth factors. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32589. [Cross Ref]
57. Estes BT, Wu AW, Storms RW, Guilak F. Extended passaging, but not aldehyde dehydrogenase activity, increases the chondrogenic potential of human adipose-derived adult stem cells. J Cell Physiol.2006;209:987–95. [PubMed]
58. Pilgaard L, et al. Effect of oxygen concentration, culture format and donor variability on in vitro chondrogenesis of human adipose tissue-derived stem cells. Regen Med. 2009;4:539–48. [PubMed]
59. Vidal MA, et al. Comparison of chondrogenic potential in equine mesenchymal stromal cells derived from adipose tissue and bone marrow. Vet Surg. 2008;37:713–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
60. Mehlhorn AT, et al. Differential effects of BMP-2 and TGF-beta1 on chondrogenic differentiation of adipose derived stem cells. Cell Prolif. 2007;40:809–23. [PubMed]
61. Guilak F, et al. Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5:17–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. Moutos FT, Freed LE, Guilak F. A biomimetic three-dimensional woven composite scaffold for functional tissue engineering of cartilage. Nat Mater. 2007;6:162–7. [PubMed]
63. Lefebvre V, Huang W, Harley VR, Goodfellow PN, de Crombrugghe B. SOX9 is a potent activator of the chondrocyte-specific enhancer of the pro alpha1(II) collagen gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:2336–46.[PMC free article] [PubMed]
64. Neidert MR, Lee ES, Oegema TR, Tranquillo RT. Enhanced fibrin remodeling in vitro with TGF-beta1, insulin and plasmin for improved tissue-equivalents. Biomaterials. 2002;23:3717–31. [PubMed]
65. Stegemann H, Stalder K. Determination of hydroxyproline. Clin Chim Acta. 1967;18:267–73.[PubMed]
66. Hollander AP, et al. Increased damage to type II collagen in osteoarthritic articular cartilage detected by a new immunoassay. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:1722–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
67. Nolan T, Hands RE, Bustin SA. Quantification of mRNA using real-time RT-PCR. Nat Protoc.2006;1:1559–82. [PubMed]