Author Archives: Senior Researcher

Eben Alsberg’s Research Is On Growth Plate Generation, Re-Implantation, and Even Transdifferentiation – Game Changing Breakthrough!!

CelebrationThis is going to be one of those posts which will definitely change the direction and content of this website. It is game changing, since it shows that we are getting much, much closer than before. Much closer than I expected, which is a shock to me. I am just amazed at just how close we just might be. Its seems like all the technical difficulties in theory has almost all been removed. Now, I feel like all that is standing in our way is funding, to get this laboratory success to be taken into the public/real world and applied.

Just 10 minutes ago I found out that one of the primary researchers I have been tracking, Professor Eben Alsberg, has been working on the exact, the EXACT same type of research that I have been proposing we should be working on.

Not only that, I barely missed meeting Dr. Alsberg. Apparently he was one of the speakers that was attending the 2015 World Termis Conference on Regenerative Medicine in Boston back in August. I was in Boston at the exact same time, at the sister conference of Termis, the Organ-On-A-Chip one. Apparently the Termis Conference was going on at the exact same days (off by 1 day) and around the exact same Boston area. Alsberg was in attendence maybe just 1000 feet away from me. Many of the people who went to the conference I went to, like the company representatives of Cellink (from Sweden), were going to the Termis Conference as well. At the time, I thought that it would only be Dr Atala of Wake Forest who would be there, and no one really close to doing the type of research I was hoping for. Well, I was wrong, extremely wrong.

Originally, I found out about Dr. Alsberg from a reader of the website who sent me a link to Alsberg’s paper on creating the first evidence of functional growth plates. Well, it turns out that for more than a decade (maybe 14 years after) after that 2001 paper came out, Alsberg and his team of researchers based in Case Western University has been fine-tuning the cartilage regeneration technique.

I would like the readers to refer to 6 sources I would like to use to validate my idea that Alsberg, like maybe 4-5 main other researchers, is working on something really close to our holy grail. I thought that no one was attacking the problem that we wanted to be solved. I was wrong again.

Alsberg is trying to regeneration the growth plate, and not just in 1 single approach. He is trying ideas which I thought was pure science fiction, the type you see in comic books.

Tyler and I have both agreed that the only way one could possibly “reopen” the growth plates is if a tissue engineering type biomedical engineer could solve the problem of converting bone tissue to cartilage tissue, which is basically one of many types of cell-to-cell transformation, known by the scientific term Transdifferentiation.{Tyler-also you could create miniature breaks in the bone and induce stem cell differentiation into cartilage;  but some growth plate cells may transdifferentiate into osteoblasts and may maintain the growth plate cartilage genetic material so by converting them back to chondrocytes may be a way to create new growth plates; however, bone still places a constraint on growth so you have to find a way to weaken or break it some how}

I have said at least twice that I don’t think it was possible to figure out transdifferentiation of bone tissue into cartilage tissue, at least this century. Even for the possibility that it would ever be possible, I was pessimistic. Well, it seems that Alsberg is trying to do just that. Since he has been working on this problem far longer and more in depth than me, he would be more aware of the exact technical details in getting this type of cell transformation to work out. If he is still trying to do it, it means that he honestly believes that it is possible. Given what I already know of Alsberg, I put my faith in his ability.

Now I refer to the reader who is somewhat knowledgeable on basic biology to read over the sources I provided below.

From the sources, I have been able to make multiple conclusion, all of them extremely positive, for our endeavor.

1. Alsberg is researching how to convert bone to cartilage. If he succeeds, which he believes is just a cell spatial-gradient and signaling issue, then we can create cartilage in the middle of bone tissue. This is a non-invasive way of growing taller!!{Tyler-Note that LSJL involves a pressure gradient and affects cell signaling}

2. Alsberg is researching how to implant cartilage (lab grown/in-vitro) back into the body.

3. Alsberg is researching how to grow cartilage tissue in the lab to be strong enough to handle the en vivo environment.

4. Alsberg already succeeded in growing growth plates almost 15 years ago, from a paper he wrote in 2001.

5. Alsberg believes that the trick to get the lab-grown osteo-chondrogenic tissue to expand is to get the spatial gradient of the cells inside the ECM to be in a certain orientation. So he already has figured that out.{Tyler-Interesting, maybe we can alter the spatial gradient within the bone via mechanical means}

6. If you look at the papers he has published from source 6 that I provided below, you can see that his research is basically circling around and around the research that is our holy grail. I did not believe that he would actually be doing the exact type of research we are hoping for, but he is. Technically, he never actually wrote that he is trying to grown functional growth plates to be reimplanted back in the body, but the 5 first sources reveal enough. A simple reader would be able to put the pieces together to form the overall picture. Alsberg is trying to to get growth plates to work out.

This type of research I did not expect for another 10 years., at least not someone who is actively tackling the exact problem. I suspect that probably by the year 2020, Alsberg with Ballock will have written a paper discussing the viability and possibility of implanting their lab grown physeal-like tissue into bone defects (from osteonomy) to increase the length of bone for people who are past the stage of bone maturity. If they believe that there is a financial windfall from taking their research into market, (aka a rich saudi prince funds them a 9-figure check to get the stuff from of lab-to public), the world will be changing in a dramatic way.

In another 15 years maybe, if they get the signaling correct, they might come out with a 2nd different way of making bones longer, by using transdifferentiation. If they are successful in doing that, we will have reached out holy grail. Imagine our grandchildren always having a non-invasive technique to make their bones longer. This is right out of a science fiction book.

I promise the readers that I will go into more detail in a 2nd post, going deeper on the science, and also creating a picture of what is possible, if Alsberg with Ballock are successful. From the looks of it, they are going to succeed, and it might not just be them. There seems to be at least another team that I am aware of, which are working on something very similar to them.

It might turn out that within 15-20 years, there will be more than 1 company who are racing towards getting this limb lengthening surgery alternative out into the market for the general public to use. As for the trandifferentiation possibility, that probably won’t come about for another 50 years at least, after I am gone. When that happens, I will be happy that finally the short statured people around the world can finally let out a breathe of relief.

Note: Of course, there is indeed a limit to how much we can length the bones of a person. Making a person who is 5 ft to 6 ft is technically possibly, but the result may be slightly weird. Not only that, what if an already tall person wants to go through with this treatment, turning themselves into 8 feet??

—————————————————————————————————————-

Refer to source #1 – http://www.news-medical.net/news/20130919/Innovative-system-can-help-manipulate-stem-cells-to-repair-damaged-tissues-and-organs.aspx

Scientists know that physical and biochemical signals can guide cells to make, for example, muscle, blood vessels or bone. But the exact recipes to produce the desired tissues have proved elusive.

Now, researchers at Case Western Reserve University have taken a step toward identifying that mix by developing an easy and versatile way of forming physical and biochemical gradients in three dimensions.

Ultimately, one of their goals is to engineer systems to manipulate stem cells to repair or replace damaged tissues and organs.

“If we can control the spatial presentation of signals, we may be able to have more control over cell behavior and enhance the rate and quality of tissue formation,” said Eben Alsberg, an associate professor of biomedical engineering and orthopaedic surgery at Case Western Reserve and senior author of the research. “Many tissues form during development and healing processes at least in part due to gradients of signals: gradients of growth factors, gradients of physical triggers.”

Alsberg, postdoctoral scholar Oju Jeon and graduate student Daniel S. Alt of Case Western Reserve, and Stephen W. Linderman, a visiting undergraduate on a National Science Foundation Research Experience for Undergraduates summer fellowship, tested their system on mesenchymal stem cells, turning them toward bone or cartilage cells. They report their findings in Advanced Materials.

Regulating the presentation of certain signals in three-dimensional space may be a key to engineering complex tissues, such as repairing osteochondral defects, damaged cartilage and bone in osteoarthritic joints, Alsberg said.

“There must be a transition from bone to cartilage,” he said, “and that may require control over multiple signals to induce the stem cells to change into the different kinds of cells to form tissues where you need them.”

In their first test, the researchers found that stem cells changed into cartilage or bone cells in the directions of two opposing soluble growth factor gradients: one that promotes cartilage, called TGF-beta 1, and another that promotes bone, called BMP-2{Tyler-Interesting that BMP-2 has been used to promote cartilage in tissue engineering as well}. The stem cells were placed in a solution of modified alginate, a material derived from seaweed that can form a jello-like material called a hydrogel when exposed to low level ultraviolet light.

The solution was divided between two computer-controlled syringe pumps, with BMP-2 in one syringe and TGF-beta 1 in the other. By controlling the rate of injection with the pumps and using a mixing unit, a hydrogel with a BMP-2 gradient starting with a large amount and tapering to nearly none and an opposing TGF-beta 1 gradient from low-to-high was formed.

The hydrogels were further modified in such a way that the growth factors were retained for a longer period of time. This enabled prolonged exposure of stem cells to the growth factors and further control over their differentiation into bone or cartilage cells.

The researchers then modified the hydrogel with a gradient of adhesion ligands, molecular strings that allow the stem cells to attach to the hydrogel itself. After two weeks of culturing the cells, they found the highest number of cells in the hydrogel region where the concentration of ligands was highest.

In a third test, they created a gradient of crosslink density within the hydrogels. Crosslinks provide structure to the gels. The lower the density, the more flexible the hydrogel; the higher, the stiffer the gel.

After two weeks, more cells were found in the most flexible gel regions within the gradient. The flexibility may allow for more free movement of nutrients and removal of waste products, Alsberg explained.

“This is exciting,” Alsberg said. “We can look at this work as a proof of principle. Using this approach, you can use any growth factor or any adhesion ligand that influences cell behavior and study the role of gradient presentation. We can also examine multiple different parameters in one system to investigate the role of these gradients in combination on cell behavior.”

If the technology enables them to unravel recipes that generate complex tissues, the biodegradable hydrogel mix could be implanted or injected at the site of an injury, the researchers say. The recipe would guide cell behavior until new tissue is formed, restoring function.

Refer to Source #2: Environmental cues to guide stem cell fate decision for tissue engineering applications

Abstract: The human body contains a variety of stem cells capable of both repeated self-renewal and production of specialised, differentiated progeny. Critical to the implementation of these cells in tissue engineering strategies is a thorough understanding of which external signals in the stem cell microenvironment provide cues to control their fate decision in terms of proliferation or differentiation into a desired, specific phenotype. These signals must then be incorporated into tissue regeneration approaches for regulated exposure to stem cells. The precise spatial and temporal presentation of factors directing stem cell behaviour is extremely important during embryogenesis, development and natural healing events, and it is possible that this level of control will be vital to the success of many regenerative therapies. This review covers existing tissue engineering approaches to guide the differentiation of three disparate stem cell populations: mesenchymal, neural and endothelial. These progenitor cells will be of central importance in many future connective, neural and vascular tissue regeneration technologies.

Refer to Source #3: http://www.termis.org/wc2015/docs/programWednesday.pdf

Refer to Source #4: New Method Grows Thicker, Stiffer Cartilage

Many research labs are busy working away at developing better tissue engineering techniques to grow replacement parts for aged and damaged human bodies. Here’s a lab at Case Western that has developed a new and promising cartilage growth technique.

A lab discovery is a step toward implantable replacement cartilage, holding promise for knees, shoulders, ears and noses damaged by osteoarthritis, sports injuries and accidents.

Self-assembling sheets of mesenchymal stem cells permeated with tiny beads filled with growth factor formed thicker, stiffer cartilage than previous tissue engineering methods, researchers at Case Western Reserve University have found. A description of the research is published in the Journal of Controlled Release.

“We think that the capacity to drive cartilage formation using the patient’s own stem cells and the potential to use this approach without lengthy culture time prior to implantation makes this technology attractive,” said Eben Alsberg, associate professor in the departments of Biomedical Engineering and Orthopaedic Surgery, and senior author of the paper.

Think of all the people with painful knees, fingers, and other joints because their cartilage has worn down. The ability to fix all these damaged joints would cut pain and increase mobility. Increased mobility would also increase exercise and muscle mass.

Among successful tissue engineering projects so far: functional replacement mouse pituitary glands, replacement urethras for kids, and bladders for adults. The list is going to grow every year and the rate of growth is going to accelerate.

By Randall Parker    2011 December 04 09:57 PM

A lab discovery is a step toward implantable replacement cartilage, holding promise for knees, shoulders, ears and noses damaged by osteoarthritis, sports injuries and accidents.

Self-assembling sheets of mesenchymal stem cells permeated with tiny beads filled with growth factor formed thicker, stiffer cartilage than previous tissue engineering methods, researchers at Case Western Reserve University have found. A description of the research is published in the Journal of Controlled Release.

“We think that the capacity to drive cartilage formation using the patient’s own stem cells and the potential to use this approach without lengthy culture time prior to implantation makes this technology attractive,” said Eben Alsberg, associate professor in the departments of Biomedical Engineering and Orthopaedic Surgery, and senior author of the paper.

Alsberg teamed with biomedical engineering graduate students Loran D. Solorio and Phuong N. Dang, undergraduate student Chirag D. Dhami, and Eran L. Vieregge, a student at Case Western Reserve School of Medicine.

The team put transforming growth factor beta-1 in biodegradable gelatin microspheres distributed throughout the sheet of stem cells rather than soak the sheet in growth factor.

The process showed a host of advantages, Alsberg said.

The microspheres provide structure, similar to scaffolds, creating space between cells that is maintained after the beads degrade. The spacing results in better water retention – a key to resiliency.

The gelatin beads degrade at a controllable rate due to exposure to chemicals released by the cells. As the beads degrade, growth factor is released to cells at the interior and exterior of the sheet, providing more uniform cell differentiation into neocartilage.

The rate of microsphere degradation and, therefore, cell differentiation, can be tailored by the degree to which the microsphere are cross-linked. Within the microspheres, the polymer is connected by a varying number of threads. The more of these connections, or cross-links, the longer it takes for enzymes the cell secretes to enter and break down the material.

The researchers made five kinds of sheets. Those filled with: sparsely cross-linked microspheres containing growth factor, highly cross-linked microspheres containing growth factor, sparsely cross-linked microspheres with no growth factor, highly cross-linked microspheres with no growth factor, and a control with no microspheres. The last three were grown in baths containing growth factor.

After three weeks in a petri dish, all sheets containing microspheres were thicker and more resilient than the control sheet. The sheet with sparsely crosslinked microspheres grew into the thickest and most resilient neocartilage.

The results indicate that the sparsely cross-linked microspheres, which degraded more rapidly by cell-secreted enzymes, provided a continuous supply of growth factor throughout the sheets that enhanced the uniformity, extent, and rate of stem cell differentiation into cartilage cells, or chondrocytes.

The tissue appeared grossly similar to articular cartilage, the tough cartilage found in the knee: rounded cells surrounded by large amounts of a matrix containing glycosaminoglycans. Called GAG for short, the carbohydrate locks water ions in the tissue, which makes the tissue pressure-resistant.

Testing also showed that this sheet had the highest amount of type II collagen – the main protein component of articular cartilage.

Although the sheet was significantly stiffer than control sheets, the mechanics still fell short of native cartilage. Alsberg’s team is now working on a variety of ways to optimize the process and make replacement cartilage tough enough for the wear and tear of daily life.

One major advantage of this system is that it may avoid the troubles and expense of growing the cartilage fully in the lab over a long period of time, and instead permit implantation of a cartilage sheet into a patient more rapidly.

Because the sheets containing microspheres are strong enough to be handled early during culturing, the researchers believe sheets just a week or two old could be used clinically. The mechanical environment within the body could further enhance cartilage formation and increase strength and resiliency of the tissue, completing maturation.

Refer to Source #6: http://www.aptcenter.research.va.gov/pdfs/cvs/Alsberg-Eben-CV.pdf

How Much Will It Cost To Fund This Biomedical Project?

There were a few people in recent days who wanted to start a KickStarter project to fund this type of project. The project is the idea of using regenerative medicine, stem cell therapy, tissue engineering, and 3D Bioprinting to get an alternative to limb lengthening surgery into market.

What they were discussing was a recent post I wrote entitled – “How Close Are We Towards Growth Plate Regeneration To Grow Taller?”

In response, I have to show these people just how crazy it is to get something new in medicine to the public. Refer to Forbes.com post written back in 2014 entitled – “The Truly Staggering Cost Of Inventing New Drugs”

Eli Lilly, states that it would cost on average about $1.3 Billion USD to get just one drug approved and into the market. $1 Billion Dollars!

If you then take into consideration just how easy it is to have drugs fail trials and testing, then the real cost could be around $4 Billion. The high range is $11 Billion for just one drug to be approved.

I did a quick search on Google to find out what is the project in Kickstarter’s history which got the most funding. It seems that based on this article in Entrepreneur.com it would be the Pebble Time based Watch, with a grand total of $20 Mil. $20 Mil is indeed a lot of money to fund such a project. Of course I have been to trade shows for the latest electronic gear in Hong Kong and China before so I have seen at least 4-5 companies who have also come out with similar type products, aka a smart watch which looks suspiciously similar in design to the Apple Watch.

What we would need to get this project started would be something at least 50X that amount. How many people would even believe us that this idea we have is even possible?

I have emailed someone named Harald from the beginning of this website back in 2012 and he has still not been able to raise even $100 K  to get people to fund what he says is research. He claims he is part of a biomedical team of researchers. It has been 10 years and so far no one has been willing to step up. The honest truth is that no one will step up. The first $50 Mil will be just wasted money, since it will just be used as initial startup cost, which will be sunk cost which would take maybe 20 years to get back, if the project is successful.

This idea I have shown to be quite valid would require a truly herculean amount of will, effort, and money to get it done. There is probably less than 10 people in the entire world who would have the financial ability and incentive to fund us. Of course, for any type of potential investor to invest in us, (since no one wants to loose money on a bad investment), we would have to first show very clearly that the science and the technical details are completely valid and it will work.

Trying to get people to open their wallets is one of the hardest things one learns to do as an adult. Selling is truly the most important skill to learn.

Instead of going on Kickstarter, me and Tyler would have to go on Shark Tank and ask Mark Cuban, who actually has a billion, and the other less rich sharks to give us at least $100 Mil to get started on this project. Of course, then once we reach the first goal, we would have to go back and ask for another $300 Mil. At $300 Mil, not even someone like Kevin O’Leary would have the money to fund our endeavor.

I can see Mark Cuban, who loves basketball and owns a basketball team being very interested in funding a company or project like this, as well as the other sharks. Unlike Cuban, who is 6′ 3″, the others are of short stature. Daymond John, Kevin O’Leary, Robert Herjavek, Barbara Corcoran, they are all on the shorter side. I can see a trip on Shark Tank being most likely to work out. It would at least give our project the big exposure we need, and the short statured “sharks” would definitely be interested in getting something in life which even they can’t buy with their millions. Money can buy limb lengthening surgery for these guys but they probably will never be willing to put up with the pain, loss of time, and helpless feeling.

The other options is to find a rich Arab/Saudi Sheik or Prince who might have a height complex and is willing to give us maybe $50-$100 Mil to get the project started. Before when I used to work in the alternative energy sector in a former life, the CEO at the time said that the company I was at was in talks with a Saudi Family in getting investments (as well as the billionaire T Boone Pickens). My CEO told in passing that apparently the real net worth of the Saudi Family was a total of $1 Trillion!! (True Story).

The third option is to look for a crazy billionaire who was a scientist or biologist in a former life. Off of the top of my head, I am thinking Patrick Soon-Shiong. Patrick is supposed to be the richest person in all of Los Angeles. He is the type of person who is willing to take moon-shots, similar in style to Google. At the current moment Soon-Shiong is willing to put his own billions in looking for a cure for different types of cancers. If he is willing to put billions down to search for a cure for cancer, he just might be willing to also put a billion down to get this stem cell therapy to work out. I honestly believe that if this form of limb lengthening surgery alternative reaches the public market, it will become a multi-billion dollar industry within 10 years.

The last option is just a crazy billionaire who is willing to believe in our idea. Richard Branson. From Necker Island. Is someone like Branson willing to talk to a person like me? Personally, I have met Branson before when I was in Las Vegas in an audience where he was giving a speech and Q&A. He was very inspirational but he is also a very smart, shrewd, calculated business man who is always willing to get a good deal on a business.

If we are going to present our idea to any of these billionaires, I suggest that first we actually really dig deep into the science, learn everything we can, write out a 1000+ page book out to explain all of the technical details, and find someone who knows these types of investors in maybe 5 years.

This is assuming that the researchers at EpiBone don’t come along and get further into the research and development than us.

A Viable, Real Method To Stop Growth Plates From Closing By Inhibiting Chondrocyte Mineralization and Epiphyseal Cartilage Neovascularization – Breakthrough!

Recent searching through the Google Patent Database revealed a few patents which have been filed which pertains to our goals.

The most important patent is a couple of researchers from Columbia University, Jie Jiang and Helen Lu entitled Methods for inhibiting cartilage mineralization – WO 2008156725 A2″.

What makes this patent so unique and special is that the chemical that is proposed for injection to the locallized area is a chemical which I have written before multiple times and theorized was the key to possible bone interstitial growth even after bone maturity. – “Parathyroid Hormone And Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein May Lead To Non-Invasive Epiphyseal Growth Plate Regeneration (Big Breakthrough)”.

Of course that post was written in late 2012, which was only the very start of my research. It seems that this patent which was filed back in 2008 seems to validate this idea that using Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein (PTHrP) would have inhibitory effects on the mineralization process on chondrocytes in hyaline cartilage.

Here is what is important to realize. This patent technically talks about using PTHrP on articular cartilage. The fact that two researchers from a leading research university is willing to put 5,000K USD to file a patent for this idea shows that the science is real. They thought the idea was viable enough to get a patent on it. So I would say it is reasonable to assume that using PTHrP on the articular cartilage will prevent the chondrocytes from mineralization.

Scientifically speaking, when you do the research on looking at how IHH (Indian Hedgehog) controls the rate of stimulation of PTHrP in the profeliferation and hypertrophic layers of the growth plate, it might cause the more discriminatory researcher to suggest that maybe IHH, not PTHrP should be the chemical we should focus on. Technically, it is true that IHH is the chemical that will cause PThrP to be stimulated. There is a negative feedback look in the layer of the growth plate. If the PTHrP chemical is stimulated, it tells the levels of IHH to drop, like a sort of check system to make sure the chemical process doesn’t turn into a run-away chemical reaction chain. However, from what I remember, it is PTHrP that is what actually causes the type of chondrocyte actions that we wants, specifically increased proliferation and then increased hypertrophy. In addition, I seem to remember vaguely at least 1 study which says that increased PTHrP seems to prevent the hypertrophic chondrocytes from undergoing apoptosis too quickly.

This is why I believe that this patent (or method/technique) can be translated to the application of inhibiting chondrocyte mineralization also in the epiphyseal cartilage layers.

If you read the patent and dig into the details, the inventors mention that there is at least half a dozen ways to get the PTHrP to be administered to the deep zone layer of articular cartilage. if there is a half different way to get the chemical to reach the end of the bones/ epiphysis, then there is probably the same number of ways to reach a growth plate that is still not fully closed.

To further validate this idea, there was also another patent filed by a completely different research team based in China on the same idea. You inject PTHrP to stop early onset osteoarthritis.  Refer to the patent # Treatment of early-stage osteoarthritis
US 8586533 B2″. For this particular 2nd patent, they prefer the intra-articular injection method. Also, for the exact amount of PTHrP used, they suggest within the range of from about 0.1 nM to about 200 nM in the synovial fluid of the synovial joint. 

What is even more amazing is that fact that we don’t even need to use this organic protein alone to inhibit chondrocyte mineralization.

Refer to the studies below.

Here are the other chemicals to stimulate. – TFG-Beta1, Glutamate, and Vitamin C Sulfate.

Here are the chemicals to decrease – Annexin V

So theoretically, would injection of a TGF-Beta1 and PTHrP combination into the layer of growth plates work in stopping the growth plates from completely closing up?

Of course, no chemical is good enough to completely inhibit the process of epiphyseal fusion. I forget which study I read (involving Sox9) which explained in extremely fine detail what was the exact chronological steps for the chondrocytes to die and have the remaining area turned into osteoblastic tissue.

The first step I believe was that the hypertrophic chondrocytes had something activated to cause them to secrete the chemical alkaline phosphatase (ALP). The waste that is expelled by the chondrocyte which had expression levels of ALP in it caused the area to become vascularized. Once the area becomes vascularized, then it become mineralized. Certainly mineralization is one of the key steps in this multi-step process. Then there are maybe 4-5 other steps after this, but we are not going to focus on those steps. In any series of chemical reactions, the easiest way to stop the series of reactions is to stop the first reaction from happening, thereby nipping the entire thing at the bud.

The idea that if we can just inhibit this one step, the mineralization step, means that the overall ECM still stay elastic and not bone hard. It may still go through the step of neo-vascularization become vascularized, and it may cause a run-away reaction of all the chondrocytes going through apoptosis but the matrix should stay in a cartilage-type tissue form for a much longer time. This would give the overall structure to possibly more time to expand longitudinally, thus making the bones longer than if they went their normal rate.

In conclusion we might consider the idea of also using Chondromodulin Type I or Type II, as well as GDF-5 in combination ,to possibly stop the vascularization as well.

If we stop both the mineralization and the vascularization, then we would stop the growth plate from ever closing, if we can figure out how to stop the hypertrophic chondrocytes from expression ALP through their waste.

{Tyler-Note that just because mineralization of the growth plates ceases does not mean that height will increase.  Stopping growth mineralization does not stop growth plate senescence see mice and rats.  Also, slowing down mineralization has been shown to decrease height in some instances.  It’s possible that it could increase height but experiments would be needed to test.  The better strategy is to stop growth plate senescence._

Scientists Have Gotten Cartilage To Grow In The Lab From Explanted Seed Chondrocyte Cells And Reimplanted Back Into Patient

This is just some extra news that is worth showing the readers that the idea of taking a small piece of tissue from a patient, and then growing the cell into tissue in a lab culture in small microbiology petri dish, is very straight forward. This is something i already has been done at least once before by some other teams. Not only does the full tissue become synthesized in a culture dish, that tissue is reimplanted back into the cartilage defect areas of the patient. The entire process from the earliest step to the final step has been taken.

The last step now is to get the explanted tissue of chondrocytes to be grown into a columnar structure (via Thyroxine, refer to insanely critical study on power of Thyroxine to form growth plate organization ie columnar fashion back in 1994 by Dr. Ballock and Reddi Here) and have the released waste of proteoglycan and GAG (Glycoaminoglycan) into the ECM (Extracellular Matrix) to expand so that the tissue can expand, turning it into a “synthetic growth plate”. <– This step should not be that hard, and I believe it has already been accomplished in a research grant from 2012-2014.

Refer to the article “Doctors Have Discovered A Revolutionary Treatment For Knee Injuries” on Business Insider.

At Ohio State University, in the Wexner Medical Center, a  Dr. David C  Flanigan (His website is at www.flaniganmd.com) and his research team have been testing human cartilage grown in the lab. A patient named Taylor Landgraf, who was locally trying to get to the local gym and using a skateboard fell and tore the cartilage in his knee, as well as tearing his meniscus.

Taylor decided to look into getting some type of more modern type of treatment to repair his cartilage, since cartilage is probably one of the only tissue types which do not regenerate and heal itself, due to its unique structure. I would assume that he would get in contact with the Wexner Medical Center and somehow learn about the possibility of having lab grown tissue transplanted into his body.

So the researchers take a little bit of chondrocyte tissue as a type of tissue seed material from Taylor’s body. It is placed in a medium (agragose/hyaluronic acid/etc.) and grown in a cell line. The cartilage cells are replicated over and over again (I do have some issues here since it is well known that all cells have a limit to how many times they can replicated, similar to the idea of the Hayflick Limit).

Based on my own personal experience of listening to the speaker/CEO of RoosterBio, a company that sells mesenchymal stem cells, it was told to me that to have enough quantities of cells to form a reasonably large sized tissue, say even 2 cm by 2 cm, you would need around 60-200 Million cells. This suggests that if we assume cell mitosis, then to divide 10 times reveals a 2^10, or approximately 1000X magnification of cell numbers. What I am trying to say is that the amount of tissue you have to carve out of the patient may be quite sizable to have at least around 100,000 cells to start with (10^6). Assuming the Hayflick Limit of around 30 mitotic divisions (from the age of 20-30) , then we can start with much less. If we are assuming from the fetal stage, Wikipedia says instead that the limit of division is around 40-60 times.

Anyway, the result from starting with a cell line, and replicating it over and over again is a piece of living cartilage, about the size of a quarter (diameter of an inch, or 2.5 cm). You take that quarter sized cartilage, and carve it into the shape of the cartilage defect in the patient’s knee (or any other joint or location where cartilage has been scratched off). and pop it into the area where cartilage is missing.

So why is this worth mentioning? Is this big news or old news?

I wrote this post as a proof of concept. The type of cartilage that you get is most likely not going to be of the epiphyseal type, hyaline in nature. It will be fibrocartilage. The cartilage has an unorganized cartilage organization structure (ie. non-lamellar). Articular cartilage is hyaline in nature. Would the two different types of cartilage which now are next to each other bind at the boundaries and have something that will function overall at a reasonably good level? The reseatchers at this lab at OSU seem to think that this type of therapy is good enough for Taylor, at least semi-permanently for maybe 10-20 years. When that fibro-articular cartilage composite type starts to break down in 15 years, the researchers will have gone further on the tissue regenerative science and have something much better for him down the line in the future.

In fact, there is probably a much better technique for this Taylor patient which he should have tried, called Microfracture Surgery. Microfracture Surgery involves the surgeon just stabbing  the subchondral bone layer underneath the now grinded out articular layer of the knee epiphysis to make a hole. The stem cell type medium that exists in the cavity of the bones will leak out, and form as a type of blood clot turning into fibrocartilage tissue.

This way of doing it by the team with Flanigan seems a little too invasive, and not that necessary. However, it shows that researchers can grown cartilage in the lab from a patients own chondrocyte (or maybe even MSCs) and grown the cells into tissue, and reimplanted back into the body, and have that transplant to work just fine.

This is another step in the long process for what we ultimately want. It is a proof of concept for one of the most critical ideas and steps.

My Calling Is Helping The Most Lonely

Sometimes I don’t pay enough attention to this project or the research. I leave for a while to live my life and focus on other areas of it. Then I find something, read something, that makes me remember the real reason why I ever first started this quest. My girlfriend left me, I was devastated, and I believed that one of the reasons she left me was because I felt I was not tall enough. She left me for a guy who was much taller than me. It hurt me at a level which I have never felt before, and I swore on my life that I would find a way to change the situation, not just for me, but for other guys in the world.

I remember once reading this controversial article from some internet website where the author wrote that men in today’s world are no longer needed by women, since women can do almost everything better than men. The way the school system is setup reveals that academics rewards the students based on following orders and being disciplined, which has never been a strong point of young men. While men still need women for the act of reproduction, companionship, intimacy, and sex, women no longer need the skills and qualities within men for survival. They no longer as the males of their family to go out and hunt down a sabretooth tiger for the even meal. As a heterosexual male who have somewhat old-fashion conservative views, the article seemed to push at a pressure point within my psyche that made me feel insecure, sad, and a little bit angry.

It turns out that when the modern young adult female talks about the income inequality among the sexes today, the women are not comparing themselves to the bottom 80% of men in their society, but the top 20% of men. In every society, there is always a heriarchy of men, with some being of higher class, and most men being of the lower class. Throughout the history of the human race, within almost all tribes and groups, it would turn out that the majority of males would never get a chance to have sex, and find a sexual partner or mate in life. Historically, it was the top minority of men in society who get sexual access to the majority of females. Think of the harems of the Emperor of China or the Caliphate of the Ottoman Empire or the Persian Empire, which had up to thousands of young girls who were carefully protected from other men by the army of the male rulers. Being a human guy in this world, in any time frame, has always been hard. It is just that hundreds of years ago, being born as a female was also very hard, with the constant threat of kidnapping, assault, rape, and forced marriages. Now that the world has become more peaceful and most men in the developed world no longer view females as property, the females of our species don’t feel that type of threat from male strangers that they were taught hundreds of years ago. The main point is, in this modern age, it is much harder to be a guy than a girl. When we really, objectively look at the overall condition of the human race, it has been the males who have suffered the most throughout history.

I refer to the readers this amazing book “Is there anything good about men? How Cultures Flourish by Exploiting Men” by the professor Roy F. Baumeister. This book will shake the very core belief system of most young men who were born and/or raised in one of the developed western nations. 

Of all the types of men who would most likely fail with females, I believe that it is men who are short who have it worst. The only exception may be being disabled, and that can be up for debate. The fact that short men are so disrespected and treated badly by society, and looked down upon by girls as unworthy of companionship shows that this type of discrimination is too pervasive in the minds of females. Being short is often the kiss of death.

The silent pain and suffering that this certain group of guys go through in life is felt. I am not God, and I am not a savior. I am trying my best to help a minority group of men in this world who are prevented from finding companionship because they did were not lucky at birth and ended up short. Being short and ending up a certain height is something that is almost completely out of our control. However, we should have that type of power and control, if we really wanted it.

This world is really hard for the short men. Maybe we can find some solution to make it so that their problem of short stature can be solved. It might not come about tomorrow, or even a year from now. However, I believe that one day we will find multiple solutions to solve the problem of being short.

Rejection

From Reddit/r/ForeverAlone – Tried to get a female friend to set me up with someone. Her response: “sorry, you’re too short”  – (https://www.reddit.com/r/ForeverAlone/comments/3hu8el/tried_to_get_a_female_friend_to_set_me_up_with/)

 

 

 

 

CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing Tool Hints At Pre-Programmed Babies With Superhuman Intelligence and Height – Huge Breakthrough!

Most people who are in the online community who discuss the issues and problems related to being short might sometimes wish that their own children (or future children) will be taller than them so that they don’t have to go through the same kind of ostracizing that the parents got when they were younger due to their short stature.

There was even one thread on an old reddit post which turned viral because a wife suggested to her husband (immediately after sex) that she would prefer to have a child with another man instead of him because her husband was short statured. She was afraid to make her future sons or daughters short because they would have it harder in life. Based on what I have read from the evolutionary biology books like The Selfish Gene by Professor Richard Dawkins and The Red Queen by Matt Ridley and Sperm Wars by by Robin Baker, that action is basically the worst suggestion a heterosexual female can tell her chosen lifelong male partner. Genetic infidelity or the idea of using one’s hard earned resources to take care the genetic offspring of another man is probably the worst offense a normal male could ever be asked to do. Humans as animals are evolutionary programmed to resist this idea on the most instinctual level.

Well, there is a type of genetic engineering revolution that is going on in the biology, genetic, molecular biology, and biomedical research labs around the world right now that would signal the possibility that we may one day be able to design a person from birth to give them the qualities that we desire. No more can a woman (or man) complain to the world that the reason they don’t want to mate and be with a potential romantic partner for the long term is because of a perceived genetic lottery loss for their future offspring. When we think about all the times when a short female refused to date, marry, or mate with a short male and used the excuse that she just didn’t want to have short children, we realize that this extremely primal/instinctual desire will no longer be worried over.

This gene editing technique is going to change everything. It is a disruptive technology (as coined by Clayton Christensen) in every sense of the word. It is not going to be immediate and you won’t find super-babies next year, but it has made the idea of “super-babies” an almost guaranteed certainty.

This CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing tool has been so revolutionary that the use of it within the labs around the world has spread like wild-fire. It is probably the biggest Biotech Disruptive Innovation that will come about this century. Where gene editing was extremely hard and inaccurate before, this tool which was only developed in the beginning of this decade has made gene editing extremely easy.

This tool is going to change the field of biology, genetics, and agriculture completely. And that is not an exaggeration. Most researchers from MIT to Caltech are talking about the implications of this technique, which is so simple and non-technical that a BioHacker in his DIY Lab in his/her garage can use it.

There was news that came out about this team in China which has been using the technique already on embryonic cells and the news has shocked quite a people in the biology/genetics world.

If the readers can remember the basic premise of the movie Gattaca, with Ethan Hawke, and one of the few instances where we get a glimpse of a person having limb lengthening surgery performed on them in a blockbuster movie, this technique is basically the key that could very well unlock the door to that world. I am not here to judge whether a potential future where people will be judged solely on their genes is a dystopia or not.

This technique is going to let expectant parents choose the features of their child that they want. We are reaching the level of Science Fiction now.

While genetic manipulation is not going to work on an adult, unless they are going for a radical total cell transplantation with genetically modified cells ala artificial dialysis machine style (where you pump the ordinary cells out of the body and have new gene therapy treated cells flushed into the body), this technology in a few decades will change everything on how we view natural human babies.

How would the average couple in the year 2050 feel knowing that their more well-off neighbor couple can afford the extra $200K treatment to change the phenotypically traits of their unborn child to be 3-4 inches taller and 20-30 IQ points higher? That type of advantage leads to so many bioethical questions for the researcher scientists today.

Of course, we should maybe take a step back and remember the fact that height is not one of those traits that is controlled by one gene. It is not something like the color of one’s eyes or whether one has a widow’s peak or not. Height is quite complex.

It turns out that height is controlled by at least hundreds, if not thousands of genes. The closest we have come to finding one gene that has a profound effect on height was the HMGA2 gene (HMGA2 is confirmed to be associated with human adult height.) From another source, we find out that “…Adults with two copies of the height-increasing version of the HMGA2 variant are on average 0.8 centimeters taller than adults carrying two copies of the other version”. ) Sure, 0.8 cm does not seem like that much, but it is almost 1 cm, and 1 cm will over time become noticeable, when you then combine the effects of HMGA2 with the GDF-5 Gene. From the same source, we learn that “…pointed to a second gene, GDF5, of which the average height difference between genotypes is 0.4 centimeters.” Since most of the world is based on the metric system, and most people state their height to the 3rd digit, that extra centimeter can mean quite a bit.

I personally have heard enough stories of people in China and India being rejected from their dream jobs because they were off the job height requirement by 1 cm.

We know based on just looking at some common organizations like the US based NBA basketball organization that there are families which have the gene for tall stature. There are many brothers, twins, and father-son combos we find in the NBA. Clearly someone like Yao Ming has that genetic trait. It would not take that much to get blood samples from those who have familial/genetic propensity for tall height, and slowly over even a decade figure out what are the other 500+ genes which when expressed properly, would cause a genetically engineered baby to be 4-5 inches taller than through the natural path.

So is it that big of a deal that some potential mother or father would want to spend hundreds of dollars to alter the genetic material of their baby to be taller? I believe that some people will care that much about it. They would gladly open their wallets and pay for that type of treatment. The world is becoming more and more competitive, especially for the younger generation of kids, who are now competing on the global level. The young Chinese prodigy will be competing against the young Indian prodigy in 30 years – a billion vs another billion. People will do what they can to give their offspring as many advantages as they can for later life success.

I wrote about this technology before in the post “CRISPR Technique with Cas9 Enzyme To Alter Hereditary Traits Easily” back in 2013 but in the span of 2 years, everything has changed.

For the love of god, I am begging the readers of this website to read this article from the MIT Technology Review magazine – “Who Owns the Biggest Biotech Discovery of the Century? – There’s a bitter fight over the patents for CRISPR, a breakthrough new form of DNA editing.”